Ivo Reflections

  

An innate quality of the fabric of existence took shape and form.
Since actual existence necessitates the possibility of it being observed, the very arising of a dimension - such as our physical universe - implies that it was set within a context where observation was at least potential.

This suggests that something already existed - perhaps in an extra-dimensional or non-physical form - that provided the conditions for manifestation to occur. Manifestation is not an isolated emergence from nothingness, but an outcome of what was already present in some form: an overarching cosmic structure/dynamic.

Being a product of divine timing(: things happening just in time), inherent intelligent guiding principles guide the emergence of observable reality.

Observation is a necessary condition for actual existence (meaning something actually exists - is there - in one's fabric of awareness). Existence beyond that, as is implied by the observed, exists only abstractly. This means that, fundamentally, manifestation is recursive, being created by the observation that seems to be induced by the manifestation.

In other words:

Existence itself implies the potential for observation - without it, being lacks coherence. For a dimension like our physical universe to arise, there must have been a precondition — whether a conscious observer, a mental dynamic, or an inherent field capable of perceiving and interacting with the unfolding reality.

This suggests that manifestation didn't arise from nothing but emerged from something already present, perhaps non-physical or extra-dimensional. The process was guided by a natural unfolding—what one might call divine timing—a sequence that reveals the deeper architecture of existence.   

A key question emerges: did the physical realm manifest as a continuation of prior dimensions, woven into a vast, interconnected cosmic dynamic? If so, this unfolding is shaped by intelligent principles that inherently guide the emergence of what becomes observable.

At its core, observation is inseparable from existence. To exist is to be within awareness; without this capacity, existence becomes abstract rather than actual. Manifestation, then, would be recursive: shaped by the very act of being observed, which itself is induced by what manifests.

Unity, synergy (alignment/integration) - Separateness, fragmentedness (discrepancy).
Unity and synergy (functioning/being as one) serve as alignment or integration - while separateness and fragmentedness arise from discrepancy.

Intimacy is connected to psyche-/mind-force.
Intimacy is connected to inner awareness: psyche-/mind-force.
  
Everything is essentially a balancing system: entropy.
Everything is essentially a balancing system driven by entropy. Total balance, at the point of total entropy, would be total alignment/integration - as opposed to there being any degree of disorder and discrepancy.

More information:

Entropy, often thought of as disorder, is actually a balancing force in nature. It drives systems towards equilibrium and prevents absolute static states. When entropy reaches its maximum (the 'end' state in thermodynamic terms), the system is in total alignment, because there's no further potential for order to be disrupted.   
  
From a physical perspective, absolute balance is indeed synonymous with total evenness. When entropy reaches its maximum and a system is in equilibrium, it is in a state where all possible forces (such as energy, particles, and momentum) have been evenly distributed, and no further macroscopic changes can occur. The system is statistically uniform, and thus, it is structurally aligned in the sense that no discrepancies remain to disrupt this balance. This state of evenness is the fundamental physical manifestation of balance from the perspective of statistical mechanics and thermodynamics.

Cause and effect (or the consequences of one's doing: karma) is a repercussional system.
Cause and effect - which, in essence, is what 'karma' is, essentially meaning: one's 'doing' as it literally translates to [one's] 'action(s)' or [one's] 'deed(s)' in Sanskrit - functions as a repercussional feedback-system, in that every action has a corresponding reaction/consequence/'reflection'. This functions as a balancing-dynamic throughout systems.

When discrepancy 'begins', intricate order persists despite temporary disorder.
When discrepancy 'enters the mix', intricate order remains to an extend despite some disorder arising. Over time, (opposing) forces lock one another into place, creating structure and forming a new equilibrium.
  
Matter is an emergent phenomenon arising from greater discrepancy and lower alignment.
Matter is a fluctuation or force within the balance, emerging from the encompassing field as a manifestation of more discrepancy and less alignment.
  
Intimacy operates at a higher level of alignment, closer to balance.
Intimacy operates at a higher level of alignment, closer to balance - where forces harmonize rather than fluctuate. This is conducted by - and conducts - an at-ease state and resolvedness.

Intimacy is tied to balance, like cause and effect and tranquility.
Intimacy is linked to balance. Cause and effect is a balancing force - and the at-ease, relaxed, restful, resolved state is a (well-)balanced one. Intricate order arises naturally in the balancing process.
  
Initial state of balance was a more integrated one.
This state of balance would be a more aligned or integrated state (as opposed to a separate and temporary fluctuation or distinct occurrence - which is more substantiated/massive, as opposed to potential-having) - our existence having arisen from/within this more integrated(: oneness, functioning as one whole) state. Alignment(/coherence) (like pre-existing structure/conditions/symmetry, for example) would primarily be fundamental, because for there to be coherency and order in the univere there should be a compatibility behind it all that allows for things to even be coherent enough for there to be patterns and further complexity to be expressed in terms of it.

Creation works through (recursive, iterative) feedback-loops.
The universe is, and structures (like particles and waves) are, a feedback-loop between a variety of elements interacting. Forces which lock one another in place create cycles (particles are like waves, being like oscillations), where a cycle may build on the previous cycle - making for an iterative dynamic.
Also, feedback arises in dynamics such as evolution (trying to prepare for the future based on the past) and awareness (which is a continuous feedback-loop in itself between one and oneself, and the surroundings: one has to live with oneself and the surroundings).
As such, reality is an interplay of recursive structures.

This framework integrates several ideas regarding alignment, balance, and the nature of existence. The relationship between unity, synergy, and intimacy, in particular, emphasizes an approach where balance arises from forces interacting harmoniously, rather than from a chaotic or unordered state.
  
Matter emerging from greater discrepancy and lower alignment suggests that the universe works through a dynamic process of balancing forces, where disorder is not truly chaotic but part of a larger system aiming for equilibrium - this point of total balance, the point of total entropy, being the point of highest alignment.

The role of cause and effect as a repercussional system ties everything together, suggesting that every action, even in its most chaotic form, contributes to a larger pattern of balance and realignment over time. This process creates a deeper sense of intimacy - of connectedness - not through randomness, but through the intricate order that exists within a dynamic system.
  
Overall, the cyclical nature of these ideas mirror existence as a field of constant adjustment and realignment: where matter, intimacy, and energy are all expressions of an underlying, balanced structure in perpetual motion.

The (more benevolent: harmonious and constant) creating-forces, to me, seem to be the main conductor(s) of this universe. The creating forces create the algorithm within which our existence exists - leaving the individual expression up to the individual.
We are a marriage of this divine intelligence to the substance that makes up the matrix of this (fractal) algorithm, coming about from the substance's structure (and its recursive nature) - as per acoustic pressure or vibration (hence: distinct fluctuation).
The notion of substance forming a recursive structure through vibration suggests a harmonic resonance underlying existence, where fluctuations give rise to distinct manifestations.

When someone seems to respond to your inner state of being (such as a mutual sense or feeling, or sense of timing - and which may include hallucinations one might have), this would be indicative of an energetic layer that bridges between inner(s) and outer. It then follows that this energetic layer may be the bridge towards higher/psychic dimensions, which may the source of our dimension and potentially other dimensions - especially given that something that could never be experienced might as well never have existed because it cannot be experienced in a meaningful way.

Convergence (one) & divergence (many)

Like a tree trunk(: a one) and the branches(: the many), many things in the universe work through convergence(: functioning as one, synergy, alignment, or unity) and divergence(: branching out, fragmentation).

The point of balance echoes the initial encompassing conditions from which the complimentary opposing sides sprang. The sides being the differentiation, the undifferentiated point/axis of balane therefore connects to the encompassing from where they manifested/differentiated.


Distinction (so division) implies imbalance - balance unifies

Distinction(: differentiation, meaning relative significance, of any part of a spectrum) introduces difference (from an other). Difference means there is a change in the transition from one to the other: a discrepancy. When something begins to move, it chooses a direction. Definition/distinction(: relative significance of something) happens through contrast/opposing forces. So fragmentation (of something previously uniform and unilateral) occurs, and partiality arises. This is the same in an imbalance, where through differentiation arises difference/discrepancy. There will be a discrepancy, causing a tension (and so likely movement). For example, problems(: discrepancies or causing discrepancy for someone) typically are likely to cause tension, instability and activity. And someone being partial (meaning you weigh your own interest more than that of others or other things) in their acting also typically causes imbalances and instability in a system(: someone or something) - and often comes forth from said unrest or urgencies, which often come the fragmented nature of a system. In selfishness is partiality(: as opposed to a mutual connection), and in dominance is a form of inequality(: imbalance) - whether those be just or unjust/immoral.


Cosmic origins: emergence from thermal balance

In the early universe, is said by theoretical physicists, the (observable) universe seems to have been in a near-perfect state of thermal and gravitational equilibrium. Minute fluctuations later are to have clumped together to accumulate into all subsequent structure(s) (like waves and solid matter). This supposed uniform state of balance in the early universe would link all that later differentiated from it to form something akin to being like the trunk of a tree of our (physical/this outer) universe, as opposed to being like a branching.


Sun & planets, atoms and galaxies: a micro-macro metaphor

 • In our solar system, the Sun's mass and energy is bigger than those of - and so is 'encompassing', in this sense(: in terms of its mass) - the orbiting planets.
 • This is mirrored in atomic structures, where a dense nucleus(: containing the protons and neutrons) outweighs the diffuse electron cloud surrounding it.
 • And there seems to be a supermassive black hole at the center of most or all galaxies (though this supermassive black hole does not outweigh the galaxy, it is still more massive than each of the individual surrounding stars).
And so we see that at the point/balancing axis, is often the more massive and therefore less fragmented/more unified or 'converged', and so 'encompassing', (in this sense) something: more like the trunk (or towards the root) of the tree and less like the branch.


Life and the psyche can be likened to the (more) converged:

Life naturally experiences: one/an individual has a psyche. Life and the psyche would be more like the trunk (or towards the root) of a tree and less like the branching, as life comes with increased alignment and coherence: having its own sense of intimacy - and a living organism physically consists of countless smaller organisms working together in symphony: synergy.


Link of intimacy to balance

 • Karma: when someone gets (according to) what they give, or gets what they had coming to them [by their 'own incurrence'/themselves originating the unevenness (be it deemed beneficial or not) wielded/conducted as by their behavior], there is justice in that 'balancing out' - which returns things to their more intimate (restful) state.
 • Entropy: entropy, from the second law of thermodynamics, this is the natural tendency of the universe to progress towards balance/(an) equilibrium (which it does following the past of least resistance).


Feminine & Masculine

 • The feminine represents the convergent quality: it is more about making things come together in a nice way (in one's experience). Think of: maintaining inner intimacy, maintaining relational intimacy - to foster emotional well-being. It also has more to do with being attractive to one's senses, like through wielding beauty, for example - or through nurturing: like through breast-feeding. It therefore to be sensitive and deal with the introverted/introspective: being receptive - the same way the feminine also 'receives' during reproduction, typically receiving the seed the masculine side 'gives' off in order to become fertilized.
 • The masculine represents the divergent quality: it is more about usurping (in the sense of overcoming/dominating confrontational forces). Because of this domination-aspect, it is also linked more to the extraverted. Likewise, during reproduction, the masculine typically gives off the seed(: the outward) which the feminine receives(: the inward).
 • The union/reunification [in reproduction] of the masculine and feminine (i.e. when they 'come together') creates a new synthesis: the newborn (or in the case of plants: a new plant, eventually) - a new iteration of the original intimacy/state of convergence, which can be of either gender.

The universe is something that turns into itself(: is 'recursive'), reflects onto itself, or is self-reflective - as well as turns inside out: like a torus (where energy goes inwards and outwards through a spiral motion via the poles) - producing them throughout the cosmos.
The universe would, like a fractal, be self-similar(: having similarities/similar patterns across all scales, as the ubiquitous presence of toroidal forms would suggest) and recursive(: coming about from the same rule being applied over and over again/iteratively, with each previous result building on the next one - hence 'reflecting onto itself' - like how mathematical fractals are produced). The torus is essentially two opposing spirals meeting at the center - where spirals are harmonious proportionality of spherical/curved(: be it forming convex or concave) geometry. Waves/waveforms are essentially spiral forms, being oscillations. Spirals underlie both particles (manifesting as oscillating wavefunctions - and particles have spin/intrinsic angular momentum, which's continuity indirectly manifests spirals) and cosmological forms/structures (like galaxies, solar systems and planets - which are torus-structures)(; both being caused by the same geometry of volume that causes the spirals/torus-structures on a macroscopic level). So: everything(: particles, waves/currents - as well as matter on a larger, including cosmological, scale) carries - and has carried - onwards its spin(ning) spirally, in that spirals - or spiral flow(s)/current(s)- manifest (directly or indirectly) from their (continued) spin(ning)/(intrinsic - in the case of particle-spin) angular momentum; that, at all (relevant/observable) scales, results from the geometry of spacetime/volume(: the 'fabric'/'medium' which mass bends - influencing its contents) - which's geometry/structure results in these dynamics and forms emerging from pressure/density fluctuation/differences (so different levels of tension/alleviation: mass/energy) in/among different (atmo)spheres of influence that interact. Like the (atmo)sphere of influence becoming thinner the further you get away from a center of mass, they can envelop one another(: one within the other).

When different (atmo)spheres of influence begin to interact and turn into one another, they - like in the case of a hurricane or water going down the drain - create vortices and spiral/torus shapes/forms, because that is the most efficient form of energy exchange between the different densities/pressure-levels. So, like a spiral travels up a current of water, the spiral is the most efficient way for stuff to displace - causing their formation during these energy-exchanges. The spiral form is the path of least resistance for the stuff being displaced. This, again, is a consequence of the geometry of spacetime/volume(-fabric), which plays a role in the movement/behavior/propagation of matter and energy as weight/mass is known to be the bending of spacetime, telling matter and energy how to move. Like water going down the drain, spacetime (which, when viewed as being like a 'medium' for matter and energy itself, could be seen as a 'water' - the spiral/torus forms/structures within it being like its vortices) begins to rotate upon expanding or contracting - forming the spiral/torus forms/structures occurring throughout all (relevant/observable) scales. The structure (or geometry) of spacetime in a state of utmost balance: the 'vector equilibrium' (as conceptualized by Buckminster Fuller), would create the spiral forms because it is space(time) that tells matter and energy how to move (as per the bending of spacetime being mass). They occur throughout all scales because spirals are self-similar(: a portion being like the whole), with the smaller portions being able to exist without disturbing the overall structure and being able to become contracting or expanding without changing its structure because the smaller portions fit within the bigger portions without disturbing the bigger.

The thing we have in common is the medium we use/are(: that which comprises existence). Everything/the universe (including this medium) would essentially be an energetic interrelation-network.
For there to be one(: 1): which would be the point of minimal distinction from something, there must also be the absence of it(: 0) and another(: 2) (and then more) - making it so the universe should be infinite.
These numbers represent ratios/interrelations, making them suitable to describe objects, or - for example - energy states: like where you place your finger on a guitar string of a certain length.
Infinite and finite structures are complementary: there can be an infinite amount of division within an enclosed boundary. That things can end or do curve back onto themselves/loop(: are recursive), and so are finite or form one whole/unit, makes it so that there can be another - in addition to making it so there can be one(: something that is something, and so something not - being the void or 'zero' from which it sprung fundamentally/ultimately, or being the other or 'two'/any ratio higher than one) in the first place: makes it so there can be definition/distinction.
Our reality does appear to be a locally governed - yet integral - whole: with us sharing the fabric of reality and the universe having been in thermal equilibrium so having been coherent/mutually attuned. Everything is one integral whole, where all other parts are needed to create one part as part of something/a whole the way it is. Therefore things (at least as we know them) are part of (an) integral inseperable and interdependent whole(s).
In the functioning of things as though one - like in a functioning of things in a constructive (including structurally, and in a general sense), complimentary, resonant (as would create something soft as in its structure becoming yielding/absorbing force as opposed to it posing resistance) manner - is unity, in many cases.

The sphere and the hollow spherical concavity are symmetric from every angle. In between and beyond those two curvatures can also be gradations of other curvature(: curvatures being inherently smooth/gradual/gradient in nature): including curvatures alternating in space and time in cyclic/oscillatory/spinning fashion to form/comprising waves or wave-like geometries/structures/forces (which include particles, being excitations in their respective fields), originating from spiral geometries that arise because of the structure that is embedded in spacetime/volume: that fundamentally arise from interacting inward and outward forces interacting with the geometry of volume/fields - which are inherent to non-destructive scalar collapse and expansion at the root of creating/forming the fractal-like structure of/that is our universe.

The hollow(/concave) and convex are complementary (polar, in this case) opposites or inverts: in this sense, each side is an equal and opposite/complimentary(: an inverted-, and 'symmetrically' inverted- at that - like: day and night, day being brighter and night being darker -) reflection/polarity of the other. Since the sides/'poles' (however many) of, say, (a) sphere(s) (or say: of fields - such as, say, a magnetic field), may be an equal and opposite(: mirrored/inverted, in this sense) reflection, either side is unique (say: left and right): so they (too) are complementary in this (in this case: a directional) sense; and so when added(/recombined) they cancel one another out and thus arrive at, upon recombination, 'zero' (or their encompassing/originating balancing axis; metaphorically, in terms of a mathematical-like equation: the equals-symbol or '=' in '-1=1') - each of them being of a different parity/polarity. Not only, say, left or right, or top and bottom, are such examples - also, as mentioned, the convex and concave(: like a convex sphere, and a spherical concavity - being opposing curvatures), or, say, positive and negative, for that matter - or masculine and feminine, and even day and night, if you will - would be. Another concrete example would be the right and left side of the body, or like one's hands: they are opposing unique sides (thus: complimentary), and so lack ultimate/absolute mirror-symmetry as either side is unique (not just in a directional sense, but also as in looking slightly different) - yet are complimentary in the sense they (overall) are (directionally, in this case) opposing(: and so, in that sense, symmetric) sides, and are originating from the same initial conditions/creating principles(: in this case the originating/encompassing 'balancing axis').
Such as in a mathematical(-like) equation (for example: '-1=+1'), the 'equals'-symbol/'=' is the balancing axis between the different opposing parities/polarities. The differentiation/difference may be there, but are in balance when both side(')s (differentiations) cancel out.

The spheres come about from things orbiting one another - which then has to be in a direction more than the other direction, in addition to the individual 'spheres' spinning in a direction (so their movement is a deviation from the balancing axis as well) - making for the symmetrical spheres (with tiny fluctuation on the surface of the boundary/edge of the sphere, which is where we live on earth); this shows they do arrive as deviations from a balancing axis: the fact that the stars and planets in our universe are spherical/'spheres' (for the most part, despite relatively tiny fluctuations on the surface) shows that our universe must have arisen differentiating by departing from this balancing axis as origin. Theoretical physics supports this: from the CMB (Cosmic Microwave Background-radiation) can be told that in these times, the universe must have been in a more homogenous(/even) state.
The reason we don't (at the very least commonly/typically - if not: at all) observe square stars or planets is because the mathematical fractions (the point of fraction being the balancing axis)/proportional relationships that make up the universe did differentiate from this position evenly as equal complimentary opposites. This complimentary parity is the more fundamental mode of the universe than the absolutely symmetrical, as everything appears to be unique ('x=x' does not exist, besides the initial 'x' - in other words/simpler terms: everything is unique) - though similar in nature/founding principles. These side's differentiations, however - again - should amount to cancelling one another out to arrive back at the balancing axis, or their existence shall not be able to be alleviated.

The reality, including solid ordinary matter, would principally be 'sound'/resonance-based(: 'sound' in the metaphorical sense, meaning: wave/frequency-technically in the broad/general sense - as opposed to just ordinary sound-waves). For example, the electrons' wavefunctions in an atom (which make up ordinary solid matter) form standing wave-patterns around the nucleus which look very much like 3d-cymatic(: the forms that arise under the influence of sound, one or multiple tones/frequencies forming harmonies) patterns/structures/forms - with nice/beautiful intricate geometries including much symmetry - in spherical geometry or as like in a 3d-resonator. These standing waves define the atom's 'shape' as a beautiful, structured wave-sculpture. The nucleus acts as a central anchoring shaping these standing waves. So the atom's full wavefunction-structure can be seen as a highly intricate, multi-dimensional standing-wave system, making up a 3d-(complex) cymatic shape: atoms are standing-wave resonators/instruments - therefore also resembling (the shape/form/embodiment of) 'sound'-harmonics/music(al harmonies: multiple tones, or intervals and their proportions), which is what makes them like cymatic forms (although not literally creating the vibrations in the air that we would hear as sound with our ears).
The (metaphorical) 'sound'-based nature of the universe, and the intelligence intrinsic to our actual existence, point to that we would be (of) an imaginative, resonance/harmonics-based(: focus/intention invokes a result), mind - us being (physical) manifestations of harmonics.

Things have arisen from the principle/fundamental nature of the universe, being: 'acoustic'(: which, in a broader sense, can be understood as concerning frequencies/waves and their resonating as a whole/in general - as opposed to just air-waves making up literal sound)/mechanical(: physical), having arisen 'sound'-wise or wave/frequency-technically ('sound' in this same broad sense: metaphorically - meaning concerning: frequencies/waves and their harmonics and resonances as a whole, in general - as opposed to just those of air-waves, as in the case of literal sound; and also, more specifically, concerning: the way the sounding of something in one's perception/awareness or [a] recording is engineered as per its form/shape: the engineering of the acoustics being something's form - 'the acoustics of a thing' in the same way in which one could speak of 'the acoustics of a room' - which room, being an enclosure, has a form - or even 'the acoustics of/within or contained by space/volume' itself: pertaining to the wave-like dynamics in the 'air' or space/volume that its geometry entails; all of which acoustics typically mimic wave-like/fluid-like dynamics, as comes forth from the fundamental nature of the fields to which matter would belongs - particles being excitations/fluctuations within their respective fields, from which dynamics the proportionality of all their forms and so the geometric founding principles of their structures arise, being: all fields and consequent resonances, dynamics and mechanics) - rendering all things to be unique, though they may be similar, having arisen integrally holistically(: as one whole, with all parts being the result of its interdependence on all other parts of the whole/form) - also meaning: following the holographic principle(: each part contains information about the entire whole such that the whole can be derived from, or 'is within' each part), where, in the universe, all have arisen together in mutual interrelation with one another - and so each part is influenced, depends on, and thus has 'encoded' within it information about all other parts of the whole; these different parts having been differentiated (fractured proportionedly) as part of one integral whole, to form equal complimentary opposites/polarities/'sides' (however many) balancing around a balancing axis to which they would add up or amount, cancelling one another out there: when viewed as a mathematical equation, the sides cancel out when '=' amounts to zero when the sides are added up. Should the result of cancelling out the sides against one another(: 'adding them' or '(re)combining' them) be non-zero, then the sides were not equal complimentary opposites, and so in that specific sense were not 'symmetrical'(-like) either (- in addition to them not being symmetrical in the conventional sense, where the shape or form does not change if you place a mirror alongside the center at an angle). They weren't even complimentary (despite one potentially having fallen for the illusion initially, perhaps), in that additional sides are still required to arrive back at the whole unfractured initial condition being the original/fundamental (as opposed to emergent) balancing axis where the remaining difference amounts to zero (where there is absolute even balance: fully symmetric in the conventional sense from any angle as a physical representation) and so nothing 'dances' around the originating balancing axis(: the '=') - or 'x=0' for 'x=-1+1'(: '-1' and '1' are additive inverses, expressing cancellation - so I am not saying they equal one another, but that they cancel out to equilibrium - being a net zero).

At our scale, thinking/cognition has emerged in us (being physically based on, or expressed in, energy network-structures - where the, at least known-, universe essentially would be an energy network-structure - such as are the firing of neurons within one's brain as well) within which the outside world may be reflected on or reasoned about, or observed. Another example of such an emergent system is scriptural programming (such as is a computer's programming language or even machine code, which depends on the firing of electrons through the wiring of a computer's hardware - being the bits and bytes; these electrons/bits and bytes are then 'things' comprised of a gradient with a boundary condition forming the edge of the individually observed 'object' being the bit or byte). The fractal(-like structure, at least) that is the universe, was created 'sound'-wise: an incurred/'applied' tension making for a 'tone'/frequency, which acoustics has cymatics: had a form - which forms arose at once: integrally holistically, embodying this 'tension'/'sound' or these harmonics/resonancse/frequencies - from which our scale: the 'world of objects' emerged, and of which harmonics it is fundamentally comprised (electrons in atoms also manifest cymatic shapes). So our reality arose integrally holistically: following the same fundamental principle(s), from the same source(s), and with like ordering-principles or proportionality, being complimentary sides (however many) around a balancing axis connected to the initial encompassing condition from which they sprung or come about; the universe/cosmos being a self-interfering 'algorithm' that has created the fractal or fractal-like structure (which algorithm is a scriptural description of the actual interrelating factors at play. This interference-pattern coming about could be likened to a 'tension'(: like where one holds one's finger on a guitar string, this 'tension' therefore being a proportioned interval - being the frequency) beginning to echo/resonate and this echo/resonance beginning to interfere with itself, creating complexity: fractures/mathematical ratios/proportional relationships in time and space; perhaps seemingly chaotic, yet being integrally holistic, so should be integrally coherent/compatible and organized in a way (and which may even make for the non-local and non-linear alignments).
This also means that, though the universe may be infinite(: there could/would always be something else), it is not infinite in possibility of what could happen: things arrive from the balancing axis (as well as eventually dissolve back into it), and as such have to have been integrally structured/proportioned/fractured in alignment with that balancing axis - to where things are equal complimentary opposites, and so proportioned/spread evenly and making up/amounting to a balance. This is where the classical laws of beauty (with respect to proportioning, also in the sense of in details such as the curvature in ledges, for example) arrive from.
It says in the Bible (from the Christian religious tradition) that masculine and feminine were created in 'God's' image. Those arose as 'equal' complimentary opposites [arriving at a net zero when treated as 'additive inverses'] - such that they would, upon (re)harmonizing, be able to tap into the divine life-source: growing a baby.
The alleged, by religious traditions, 'God' would also - in fact - be the actual (albeit also as could arise from - by cancelling out when added/recombined, of - complimentary inverted opposites) symmetry(: as in being the encompassing balancing axis). One could, though, never know if what one deems to be 'the universe at large'(: the single 'greatest'/'highest' in the totality of the universe) would really be that, and not instead be 'the greater universe'(: there being more like/'besides', and/or possibly above/beyond, this alleged 'God' - even if it were to be the broader encompassing something or circumstance from/within which our circumstances have come about).
The more morally right/just - whatever that may in turn be - would implicitly and intrinsically be the more true truth that would (re)surface regardless(/invariably), especially if one really delved into the supposed relevant subject matter that could or would then be at hand.

In 'emergent systems' such as our present-day world, the (metaphorical) 'sound'/tone-based/wave-technical(: where a resonance or tone produces an integral whole at once, and so where consistent mathematical fractures/proportions/relationships/interrelations rule - applied symmetrically/unilaterally; for example: making for the symmetric/balanced spheres or curvatures on a more fundamental level/scale - or at the scale of our emergent world: such as architecture making for well-proportioned buildings) (also: where each part of the whole is unique, though they could be similar), would be towards the positive curvature: in classical architecture each building is created uniquely yet following similar principles, such as following harmonious mathematical proportions(/fractures, like: a half, or a third, a quarter, one fifth, etc.). The buildings are rich in decoration, making each individual sub-element 'the main character in their own story'. A proportionally placed dome also exhibits this. In more modern buildings, when supposedly trying to find undiscovered beauty but really accommodating for more machine-wise building, architects deliberately abandoned this strategy and preferred deliberately asymmetrical buildings with minimalist elements so they could easily be mass-produced using machines. This would make for buildings where not every side of the building looks like the front would(: rich in attractive decoration or beauty of whatever kind or design), but rather where every side of a building looks like the plain sides or rear end(s). What I mean to get at is that this too is the manifestation of curvature: with the classical buildings showing more 'positive curvature'(: elements are unique - though perhaps similar and arising from uniform principles intrinsic to the universe, and even looking at things such as the street patterns of old cities where each road was uniquely created to fit in well with the surroundings not following a grid but an organic layout - and as such the building looks more like the 'front' than a 'side or rear end of a building': the more like the main character in the story, as opposed to being more like a background actor). A sphere(: positive curvature) would be one center, further outward would be the more fleeting flatter(: more square-like)/more negative curvature - which we see arise with mass produced modern buildings and, for example, more square/mass-produced city/town-grids. The emergent scriptural systems work with a code of characters or, as in the case of the a computer, the (on/off-switch-based) dual (classical, not quantum-) bits, being placed in a square grid: sequentially/serially - revealing/reflecting its emergent nature. Another example of something emergent would be acting reactively: in reaction to something that happens to you. Fundamental would then be: something integrally 'good', for example.
Fundamentally, the universe therefore must/should be a gradient (not merely dual/'binary', but instead with smooth gradations - which could, however, mimic 'binary', like: the peak and trough of a wave representing the binary '1' and '0'), (metaphorical) 'sound'/tone-based/oriented or wave-technical or acoustic or frequency/resonance-based structure (perhaps with harmonic intervals making for the 'illusion' of granularity on a scale-specific level, such as at the Planck-scale - or forming a dualistic bit-like informational system/matrix on an emergent/coming-forth-from-that level, but being wave- or frequency-like and gradient nonetheless on a fundamental level of the comprising medium that forms those bits in the first place): being a fractal that has come about at once/integrally(: is eternal), producing symmetrically ordered/proportioned yet complimentary(: left and right, not left and left) forms/structures(: spherical cosmic bodies); where seeming squares/rectangles or flatness only arise (as people thought the Earth was flat before they could 'zoom out' and see for themselves the Earth is a sphere) when having zoomed in on the boundary of a sphere (having formed from the interference-pattern of a great many comprising little points being its constituent particles - on a side note), at which scale near-square/rectangle geometries occur around the sphere - especially further out from the center of mass (and thus center of curvature): the more emergent squares or more 'diluted' so more negative/less positive curvature (being only a fraction of the total positive curvature being the whole sphere).

Dimensionality in one's perception (or [a] recording) comes forth from relative estimation/interrelation [of different facets/parameters].
For example: if one has ever only had one relationship, one might not know how different a next one could be.
When we talk about dimension(s), we often think in terms of space (length, width, height), but at a more abstract level, dimensionality represent the axes along which distinction(s) can be made. Without contrast/differentiation, there is no frame of reference - just as one cannot tell the momentum of something from a mere one of its locations through time (this is called: the Heisenberg uncertainty principle: a cornerstone of quantum mechanics, fundamentally stating that there is a limit to how precisely certain pairs of physical properties of any particle, like position and momentum, can be known simultaneously), a solitary experience - in this same sense - holds no internal variation to define an overall 'space': just as a single point in geometry has no length.

Resonant frequencies would be more constructive, whereas dissonant frequencies could/would generally be more destructive (unless tastefully applied) - as in where resonances last longer than dissonances. It would thus be that the reality remains in the echo of the initial resonance/impact/'sound' that initiated our universe (of differentiation). That is how, intrinsically, the right thing can come about without trial and error: purely because the harmoniously resonant/aligned or constructive 'voices of/within the reality' last longer, being more stable than the (self-)destructive/(self-)interfering ones. Likewise, a better feeling feeling - as an energetic resonance in the field of the fabric comprising the content of one's awareness/perception/sensation - also is of a more harmonious construction or better engineering of attunement of energies (as one can feel [in one's sensation of the reality]). Following this same principle of constructive resonance and destructive (self-)interference, a photon (which is a 'unit' of physical light, which is a particle as much as it is a wave - as per, or which is called, the wave-duality) travels in each and all possible trajectories from their points of origin/emittance to their destinations/points of absorption - all this is verifiable experimentally, and has been verified experimentally. The self-interfering phases of the spin of the photon-iterations causes them to annihilatie(: destructive) one another. Because the path of least resistance causes a sort of 'drag' on these phases to where it doesn't self-interfere because of the drag - making it one direction of the phase of the spin slightly prevails, making it significant through it becoming/being differentiated through this. This is why we see the photon in the place where we see it as physical light.
(You can see the evidence of this phenomenon explained in this video from YouTube-channel 'Veritasium'': https://youtu.be/qJZ1Ez28C-A).

(The laws of) harmonious proportions are rooted in symmetry as those 'play with' symmetry, or the deviating from it. Harmoniously proportioned(/well-balanced) means resonant, and disharmony (in the sense of: atonal) means dissonant.
Since things are complimentary inverted sides (however many) balancing on a balancing axis being utmost symmetry from which they: the reflections - being the curvatures, arise. This balancing axis is charactarized by, or most definitely would be, the '='-symbol - that balancing/reflecting-axis from which they emerge linking to the encompassing principle, for it is where the different curvatures converge.
Curvatures could also mean, for example: like when looking into a mirror, 'our world'(: our side of the mirror) being its own curvature and the 'mirror-world' being its own curvature, being a reflection of 'our world' on our side of the mirror - or when making an effort or doing something (which could be like the 'negative' curvature) for, say, an outcome or leading to a result (which would be like the 'positive' curvature, coming forth as a 'reflection' from that initial 'negative' curvature being the effort - as hereby conceptualized). These are [like] reflections or curvature(s). Waves are also literally curvature(s). The 'inner [world]' and 'outer [world]' could too be regarded as (such) curvature.
Here(: in the body of the physical outer), the strongest survive - which is therefore an inversion (in the same way opposites could be complimentary) where things are inverted: for it should be the sweetest(: most harmonious) that rules or shall thrive. However, constructivity (as opposed to destructivity) tends to strengthen (showing that despite additional dissonance/discrepancy in the 'inverted' physical, it is still of/containing the initial alignment/harmony). It is the mind that should raise the body, not the other way around. The mind is, therefore, the higher one, and the body the lower. Only in the inverted complimentary side: that of the physical body, would the body be seen as the guiding principle - as a consequence of the urge to survive.

Classical architecture is essentially proportioned variety/alternation of (fundamental to the universe-) 'sound'/wave-technical shapes/forms/structures: round/curved/bent/gradual/smooth(: wave-like) geometries and structures (like in domes, which could look slightly different per region, making for and its forms reflecting a different 'sound'), alternated with square shapes/forms, as comes forth from practical elements(: emergent aspect of reality) such as the shape of the walls, and then there are the triangle forms (at a certain aesthetic angle: proportioned - and/or as could be used for sturdiness of the structure) such as for the roof, in the walls and/or for decorative purposes such as a Roman temple-like façade at the front. One will find that classical buildings are layered (from bottom to top) proportionally (at least at the front of the building or the sides visible to the street): meaning floors have been separated visually on the wall from one another by something like a ledge or other decoration, and with, like, the first or second floor having an extra large ledge for decoration, and then the top floor bordering the roof with the biggest ledge being the gutter. This as opposed to no decoration or a structure where are floors are the same: making for a sequential structure (in serial fashion), meaning without proportionality in the decorations. The ledges typically are long round (convex) or hollow-round geometries (to mimic the waves of water: each being geometry based on the sphere - be it hollow, convex, or gradations in between; again, to resemble the (metaphorical) 'sound'/frequency-oriented/based aspect of existence - where waves/wave-like dynamics form our reality that emerged from it, which water-waves resemble) alternated, then alternated with square/rectangle form(s) - (kind of like in old chair- and table-legs). The windows typically are 'standing up straight', to mimic the shape of a human standing behind it, looking through it - and give enough headspace for an 'exalted user-experience'.

The feminine is more 'sound'-oriented(: which reflects in the feminine being more in tune with the feelings and emotions than the masculine): more tone-wise or wave/frequency/resonance-technically(: being the/a fundamental nature of the our existence, also in our present physical reality/circumstance - and most likely beyond that) harmonious(/resonant)-oriented. It therefore also has (softer - to make for suiting the needs of the more intimate/vulnerable younglings well - and) rounder shapes/forms(: originating from more spherical geometries). The masculine is more pragmatic and practical, both in the sense of physically: a stronger, more sturdy body - as well as intellectually: typically possessing an intellect that is more logically oriented in comparison to the typically more emotionally/feeling-driven feminine intellect. Note that: both men and women each have a masculine and feminine side.

The masculine is associated with imbalance, as the cunning or usurping (the signifying of one's interest, thus being about promoting forms of imbalance - whether it be a just or an unjust imbalance or 'overweight'/'outweighing') as a consequence of the (more) object-matic outer reality, confronting the other/survival-related 'harmonics' and/or dynamics from [the] 'parts' and/or 'fragments' (of the/a spectrum): we as spirits/psyches would be 'married to' (even though this Earth and one's physical body presently are our impermanent home) the substance (including matter): things are 'backwards'/inverted (also in the sense of opposite to our spiritual nature) down here: where the strongest tends to rule - following the laws of balancing out(: everything, overall/all in all, is on a progression towards equilibrium/the balancing axis through the path of least resistance) (also in the sense of the way balancing in the form of retribution embodies someone facing one's 'karma' - or one's  'doing', in Sanskrit) - instead of the sweetest/most harmonious, though the most constructively cooperative and constructively resonating tends to become the strongest/most stable (or the most well-balanced, as far as taste goes, which is a resonating of something in relation to one's inner harmonics/character, which one interprets). This is why illicit/unjust suffering or violence (or disregard for life/one's ability to be able to process one's experiencing) tends to upset one that has a healthy conscience and a functioning mind - (potentially) spiritually: aurically(: pertaining to the bodily energy-field)/feeling-matically and psychically damaging one (to an extend). The feminine side could also be associated with the increasingly/more spontaneous/intuitive. Cunningness would give one more ability so responsibility to act justly(: "with great power comes great responsibility"; as the saying from 'Spider-Man' goes), whereas the innocent is more connected to vulnerability, thus the less able to control using the mindful/manually/verbally thinking.
The masculine would be of the more lower(: dense, solid/persistent: relatively significant) frequencies/tones - being more oriented around and catering to the object-matic outer. The feminine would be more of the higher frequencies/tones: towards the more well-balanced and well-rounded energy signatures, so towards the less relatively significant and equilibrium - being more oriented around and catering to the inner qualities and inner perception/experience. The newborns/infants would be - in their at least relative innocence, sensitivity and vulnerability - of yet a higher frequency; which newborns could be of either gender (or any gender in existence, in the case of other life-forms). Similarly, the highest frequencies would be the most harmonious(ly resonating)/well-balanced (and thus well-rounded so well-flowing and less resistance) energy signatures, which therefore could be from any gender in existence.
The feminine: embodying the nicely coming together of opposites, or well-balancedness (also in terms of taste, including moral taste), so: balance (note that in balance there is justice as we are all equal: 'one and one equals zero difference'), in the sense of surrendering one to a relational aspect or what's outside of you that you cannot control or overpower physically (so may be persuaded to try to control based on sense of, or even exchange for, intimacy - such supporting this other relationally), or being one with the other; thus the intimacy, euphoria and more innocent. These are more oriented around (the alignment of) one's inner (experience) or spirit(: the 'resonated'/perceived [emotional and also bodily] feelings/inner harmonics - both reflecting and reflected in the outer/physical) and psyche(: inner experience of sensed perceptions), which are more connected to the (metaphorical) 'sound'/frequency-oriented/based (cymatic: even the electrons of an atom are said, by physicists, to create cymatically shaped patterns) 'tones'(: frequencies), and in that sense being like 'music' and/or its tones/notes(: such as feelings/inner harmonics/cognition/ideas - in the form of intuitions/intuitive insight, which is feeling-based as it bases itself spontaneously on the psychic - and in that sense bodily - 'sensors' producing the feeling of the intuition - and physically/seen from the perspective of the outer including sounds and colors, for example). The nicely coming together/well-balancedness of opposing forces such as embodies the feminine nature also means well-rounded/harmoniously resonating, (which also amounts/leads to physically constructively configured) energy, which makes for being one with the other - which is then intimate like oneself/one's own being. In part because of this, the feminine side could also be associated with the more spontaneous/intuitive.
When the complimentary sides (however many, but two in the case of the example of masculine/man and feminine/woman that we often see manifested) reunify: when both/opposing sides come together(: become as though one), we see new (physical) life (as we know it) arises. The (inner and outer) expressions of the universe/(our) existence are manifested on/through a diverged spectrum (or diverged spectra comprising it). Therefore, when/where the polarities/complimentary symmetries of said spectrum (or even spectra) come together along the(/a) balancing axis, this equilibrium (in this analogy most analogous to the baby: the balance) could be connected to an encompassing - including preceding and potentially following/inevitable - state (or perhaps dimension/reality or existence beyond one's present physical life) that could bear the essence to the nature of our existence/life (as we know it) as a whole, quite like the dimension new-borns are tuned in to, originating from this harmonious state of intelligence, and the literal connection to the life-source the newborn would be (being most innocent, vulnerable/sensitively feeling, feeling-matic, spontaneous of either man, woman or child/newborn).
The outer is measured using physical instruments. If we regard one's/our psyche/inner as a mainframe through which we interact with the physical world, one's psyche/inner would be perceived experientially through the physical body/senses and psychic/inner perceptual apparatus, so inner. The physical world and the scientific/physical theories about it are (at least in principle) intended to be based on tangible facts(: the scientific principle), meaning the measurements are to be measured utilizinging something from/(with)in the outer (or without the inner) to measure another part of the outer, so a fact may be proven unconditionally/invariably from any perspective/point of observation(: this logical thinking based on external facts as opposed to intuitive feelings like the feminine is typically associated with, is - in turn - often associated with the masculine).
The universe would be the balancing interplay between this state of alignment/intimacy and the relatively significantly/more persistently/more permanently being (more) solidified (thus the object-matic scale arises): the outer/physical (which survival-related urgencies - such as having to consume other organisms, for example - often prompts/induces/initiates the betrayal of this intimacy). The feminine would be the balancing axis between the imbalanced of the diverged spectrum of the 'expressions'/manifestations, which would be analogous to the masculine(: in tune with the outer, requiring skill) - and the harmoniously aligned/balanced (spirit of the) newborn(: in tune with the inner, functioning spontaneously, and innocent).

We are a connected fractal; things find their resounding somewhere... It seems to me we are in/of a living fractal: at least a fractal-like structure which is alive to an extend - including in the form of us/living beings and/or organisms. The above fractal-like shell being a tiny artifact revealing - by reflecting - the fractal-like nature of the structure of our universe, thus consists of (an) information(al) frequency-harmonic(s)/tone(s) - and it is the forces of the water(s) in which the shell has come about that lead up to its existence being that form/shape; in the abstract fractal-like 'refraction'/interference-pattern that is our volume(/spacetime) and form(s), or fabric, of the foreseeable universe. Like that, we are also (embodied by) matter of, and thus resonating (harmoniously/constructively) with, certain (information-)frequencies. Nature and art often use Fibonacci-proportions/ratios. One could come to these proportions/ratios through finding the optimally looking ratios for one's taste. The Fibonacci-proportions are nested, meaning the smaller iterations within the greater do not disturb the greater (like a spiral). This is why the Fibonacci-proportions are at the root of many fractal structures, and indeed at the root of the fractal-like properties of our universe (this being like an alive fractal). So these tasteful proportions connect us to the greater fractal structure of nature and our universe. They are also what we're of, and so it makes sense that we resonate with them harmoniously and that they end up being constructive, including constructive for us. Naturally things spontaneously form after the 'sound'/tension/frequency there. When the sound resonates constructively, structures gain persistence. From these sounds arise harmonic ratios. The Fibonacci proportions/ratios appear to be affiliated with the larger fractal being that we're in. We are in a fractal that is alive to, at least, an extend - and I think that that which is not alive of it came from that part which is alive: sublime alignment which gained some discrepancy as it diluted, where the solid forms would be slower frequencies of energy as they are more massive. As such, this cosmic/universal fractal(-like structure) would be or embody an alive being(: I noticed that after I had seen some images of fractals, I had - without having remembered - written 'Mr Fractal' in my notes-app, as if trying to tell myself something) - that we have in us, and that we really are - within which's imagination and therefore mind we are currently occupying one of the worlds it has imagined at some point(s), having come about 'magically' through resonance-based induction and attraction - forming parameters so they would be just right so as to be conductive to this higher imagination and therefore consciousness/life, which the creation would seek to embody. This fractal really is the clipping of this certain sound: an interference-pattern, with alternating tension and alleviation - oscillating, as the spherical forms are the only forms which are symmetrical from every angle, so that form/arrangement being fundamental for the geometry/structure of volume/spacetime; and becoming more fleeting/diluted and contracted/concentrated: so going from inner to outer and vice versa, where the torus and spiral form then ends up being the most efficient way of interchanging the different levels of tension or densities. Things are sequences and proportion plays with the interrupting of regularity, harmonic proportion does this at a regular rate, thus signifying tonal/frequential coherence: a certain 'sound' - connecting our psyche to that paradigm, based on how the sound we would be resonates with that.

One's (potential) experience of karma would emerge from feedback-loops being cause and effect-cycles, functioning consistent with higher order-principles: those of morality (where meaningful experience, whatever that may be to one, would be the goal).
In our existence, we experience gradations in the level of intimacy of what we're in(terfacing with).
One might become an ultimate protagonist or antagonist, or could remain entirely neutral. So there are different roles one might entertain.
It seems like the reality works through balancing-systems where certain behavior is repayed - manifesting as karmic laws: others will likely reward you, if you reward them - be it they are rewarding. Rewarding, meaning: giving someone what they want (- even if that something were to be not giving them what they want).

One accumulates debt as one willingly costs something or incurs payment(: makes one pay). One begins with a clean slate when it first is one's turn to act (- as before that moment that same one could not have willingly incurred any damage). Therefore, to stay young as a spirit, that which has become tainted by being guilty - having accumulated debt having incurred damage - is to be omitted; for, for something to be forgiven, steps should have been taken to make sure it cannot happen anymore. This is a reset.

Karmic properties naturally emerge from self-referential feedback-loops, forming closed cause-effect cycles, consistent with higher fractal order-principles.

(This whole following topic, naturally, is speculative.) Depending on one's karmic balance, one could also enter a more heavenly/blissful space/state when one's physical body dies off(: where one might enter what is typically called the so-called 'afterlife' - which one cannot presently know or know not to exist/prove or disprove, but I will personally rather take into account the possibility that when my physical body dies off, I as an individual or spirit might still be there or remain to an extend), which might be something like a reunion or coming 'home' into true sincerity/intimacy (like loving interrelation or softness, or being able to be yourself and let go: a state where you become much more vulnerable upon becoming integrated into loving vibes - hopefully) (I have been told, if you want to get into heaven you should make sure you won't stand out when you get there), or like going into a very meditated solemn space/state of great rest, restful contemplation or stillness - perhaps forgetting wether you're there or not, which poses the ultimate question as a spirit: would one like to descend back into the more individuated more dense (like heavy emotions)/standing out substance (like more permanent/persistent outer expressions such as solid matter) or does one allow oneself to be integrated into the more integrated state of bliss and stillness? One might be afraid one might totally forget and never remember oneself, perhaps considering one would perhaps not 'wake back up' 'anew' later. So this could be a great challenge one might face: does one dare to forget oneself (not knowing wether its momentarily or not) and let oneself go, or does one go back into the substance/more persistent expressions (which, being more permanent/persistent, would therefore be more dense as it is less fleeting)? This heavenly state could be a momentary reunification and rejoicing in a succesfully completed round of life, or could be like the next stage one moves into for 'longer': like get born into such a more heavenly dimension. So it could be that you enter a temporary space/stage awaiting 'relocation'/'replenishment', being the dying off of the old to be refreshed with (a?) new birth - or that one enters a new 'location' right away, so: this wipe and replenishment of bliss/innocence/'ethereal light' happening as one gradually forgets oneself, to be reborn later happening quickly or happening gradually as it is not necessary right away because one's spirit has not become too ugly (to justify the need for rebirth of/within one's being just yet). It could also be a space with more ability to look back on things(: more non-linear, all/many times at one point at one's disposal upon intended request): like where one could look back on things more precisely by bringing things to mind and recalling an event more elaborately so as to review certain things or lessons prior to entering a more permanent new 'location' - or where one finds one is still there but in a different world, and is confronted with one's own remaining being - comprised of, say, the cultivation of one's mind(: being able to live with oneself from a mind-content point of view being what naturally arises within your psyche based on the experiences and thoughts you've fed it or cultivated) and one's conscience(: being able to live with oneself from a moral standpoint based on what one did or does or would do or would have done). This could be another great challenge one might face, remembering who one really/truly was all along - or remembering one's original intention with coming into a cyclus, perhaps having forgotten this (completely or to an extend) and perhaps having done 'bad' (according to one's own standard, or perhaps immoral) things (for whatever reason, like perhaps the circumstances one has had to deal with): the being able to live with who one was (at times or at large), or is or has become - and that either fulfilling one (which would be in line with who you truly are or said original intent of your higher self or soul or overarching aspect of one's being) (this would be the equivalent of having an abundant 'karmic bank-account' with a high balance, or much accumulated 'good karma'), or being so ugly to oneself that one cannot come to terms with it and as such not find rest or arrive at a blissful or at least stable state (which would then make for a more hellish state), thus having to try again in a new cycle. This would be karmic debt (one might have accumulated, such as by having incurred damage, be it knowingly or even perhaps unknowingly), or 'bad karma': a negative karmic balance. The lessons one might (not) want to learn: challenges one might want to face in a next cycle to reach a state of greater fulfilment with regards to who one is, could be a mechanism through which one's 'karmic bank-account' would influence the/a next (re)birth (of or within one's being). This reality, space, cycle or stage one could move into after could also be a temporary space to a more or lesser extend, prior to deprecated(: too ugly or damaged) aspects of one's (psychic or otherwise) being being omitted resulting in it having to re-grow (being the 'rebirth' into a new reality, that might be of more permanent nature also - like our physical existence is not necessarily intended to be a  momentary experience, but could last quite a while), being the part of one('s greater being) that gets reborn; as opposed to the more eternal aspects of one's being, like what is called the 'soul' - being not only one's spiritual essence: one's original intention, which could be analogous to the color/tone of one's base character, but beyond that: the one who takes on different tone's/colors of character throughout different iterations. So there may be a reviewing and contemplating of one's past life while the old slowly dies off, then a moving into a more or less intimate new reality (which process may be guided by on one's own conclusions about oneself like who one is and wants to be oneself - perhaps from newly reviewed lessons and based on newly reviewed information or memories - also defining/refining one's new base intention as a spirit at the beginning of a new birth/cycle) as more permanent/persistent aspects/expressions of one's being get regrown. And since one would decide this new 'original intention' as a spirit at a fundamental level within/of one's being, being the color/tone the 'soul' or 'encompassing spiritual faculty' or 'higher self' takes on as part of an expression of it, (if that would indeed be true) this leads me to believe that the more 'heavenly' or 'integrated' or 'blissful' realms, or the 'still'/'meditated' realms, experienced by one would lead one to the encompassing spiritual faculty, with initially one's higher self revealing one's original true intention and the truth of one's being, and one's soul: the root of who one is as a spirit, which is married to the outer expression/substance through the body - to later lead into perhaps even more sacred spaces or principles. Purely speculating, perhaps where one comes into the deeper source or foundation(al principles) of reality/existence, or deeper (re-)unification - such as between (one)self and (an)other, and/or such as a reveal of how life has been like a 'set up game', like as in if one's life in our dimension/reality was as if scripted: with things/outcomes that were always (pre)destined to be(come), following certain (potential) scenarios with possible outcomes?

The laws of karma also work per symmetry (or equality): one could either 'kill killers', or 'make someone pay for what they made you pay for [that was not justly carried out because you injustly made another pay first]', or 'be forgiven the way you have forgiven others' (as is mentioned in the Christian tradition). Put in a less literal yet very real context, upon death (as is said in the ancient Egyptian tradition) one's soul (being represented by a feather to symbolize it's [ethereal] light origin) will be weighed on a balancing scale. If the scale holding one's soul/the feather drops(: the soul/feather has a non-zero weight), there will have been incurred damage by or to this person that is yet to be evened out(: the sides neighboring the balancing axis are not equal 'additive inverses', or put more simply: equal opposing sides). This damage - though some damage may be irreparable or impossible to repay, in which case there should be something like aid for this individual with respect to alleviating one's debt - in my opinion (something like this would be embodied by the Christian forgiveness-principle: [said to 'God' - which Christians typically intend to be 'the universe at large', though one can never know if what one thinks to be 'the universe at large' is not in fact 'the greater universe' - in a prayer, often before dinner] "forgive us our debts/guilt, the way we also forgive another/others their debts/guilt"; this principle seeming to represent a sort of aid destined for those with irrepairable karmic indebtment - or anyone, as Christians typically like to believe - where if they forgive all that has been done to them, 'God' - which the followers of this religious tradition typically, again, mean to be 'the universe at large', though they could never know if that would not in fact be 'the greater universe' - and so-called "son(/'sun') of God": embodiment of alleged moral behavior, shall forgive this individual/person). Only when all debts have been evened out, can one move on from this cosmic 'court of law' (meaning: physical-/mathematical laws/principles) performing this karmic processing. Up until that time, one could be situated in the eternal 'waiting room', which could be any reality one could be situated in [with no immediate escape]. One would move on to the (encompassing/originating) 'balancing axis'(: the [ethereal] 'light', also mainly in terms of weight) when the balancing scale holding the feather that is one's soul does not drop/descend. Should there be anything one could not reconcile(: which could mean one is not content with one's own moral qualities, fulfilling one's original intention - for example; or one wishes to take up on missed opportunities and the likes), then the resulting 'weight'(: being the balance of one's karmic bank account) would determine the conditions (like the nature and possibly the severity of the challenges one might face) of one's upcoming cycle(s).
So, it would be the alleviated discrepancies ([intra]personal or interpersonal fulfilment) making for a 'light'(: in weight, mainly - and in the sense of 'ethereal light') soul: giving one auric current.
To give another analog or provide another angle to this matter: the story from the Bible about the camel that could not fit through the small city gate with all the bagage on its back (he could not fit unless he dismantled all his bagage). The 'karmic asymmetries' could also be taken for the bagage or 'asymmetries' one has acquired during life (as deviating from the freedom of suffering, as described by the principles of the Buddha): the deviation from one's original 'sound'/intention as per having been ('scripturalogically') 'imprinted' on one by the 'programming' of life - and finding one's way in that.

What could happen when the physical body would ceases to function as it would when alive, could be: if one does not cease to exist and one has plenty of goodness accumulated, perhaps one gets to live on as(: what I prevously mentioned as 'get born into', or rather, as I'll put it here: get 'reborn' into) an energetic/mental being in a different existence/dimension - where one might possibly even receive a younger-making treatment (?), speculatively. This might/could be what would/could be called heaven. From this space, spirits might visit beings living among us to help/guide them (so-called 'spirit guides', called that way in spiritual circles). This would be the alternative to perishing/wallowing - or a complete reset where one may grow a being once more, or a complete reset where one returns to the being that is implicit to the existence of existence itself - which could be a more (from our perspective) eternal (in the sense of being more fundamental) being, which would be like the trunk of a tree where we're branches which we therefore all have in us, being individuals. This could be the yourself from which all stems and which we all are - if you will: the all-seeing eye(: consciousness sees all). One would/could, prior to one's life, perhaps contemplate what one would want to receive and overcome in terms of challenges so that one may prove one's robustness and solidity in the case such a situation could occur, to derive credits from that in later stages (such as later, more spiritual or harmoniously aligned stages).

What would you do if when your [physical] body ceases to exist, you would still be there (in whichever way or condition)? I'll personally rather take into account that this may happen (such as when we turn out to be beings spanning or that could span or have embodiments/manifestations in more than just the outer/physical dimension). In that sense, one should be aware that one's birth does not brainwash one, with all the programming and expectations one inherits from one's parents. Like when a commercial plays, this puts one in 'survival mode' - and binds one to the immediate circumstances and terms and conditions that apply there. One should be aware of one's eternal nature so as to preserve the original context one is in, so as to preserve one's original intention.

Since life typically consists of complimentary sides (as per self-contained curvature: curvature that bends/reflects back onto itself, within itself - before an entirely new 'reflection' or one partakes, like a new 'iteration'/'sequence' of it), I would presume that following this physical existence, there should be another existence (and then another, and then another - as has preceded us) where things that were in order initially, that could have become out of order as time went on (during life), will or would then be settled and/or be resolved/put 'back in order' - as I would deem it illogical that in a universe where its laws(: the universal contants, albeit perhaps through trial and error, or through the prevelance of constuctive resonant constructs/structures/frequencies over destructive or self-interfering ones, like a sort of 'universal' evolution) are so precisely attuned to allow for our existence, on such immense scales - given that there are no deformed animal-species, even though it is said to have come about through trial and error (which should therefore also produce 'failed' trials, yet there appear to be marginally little mishaps, such as diseases - which, then, aren't so much as 'evolutionary attempts at survival', but are more like literal mishaps/accidents [most unfortunately]); my point being that: everything is aligned to sublimely for meaningful existence to (have) come about, therefore it should make logical sense that what is yet to come will be a settling of all that may have been shattered or misaligned in the (perhaps seeming, but to us apparent) chaos of existence in this physical existence being 'our reality' (where injustice, mishaps and suffering are involved). It is my personal logical prediction (therefore I contend and believe) that those should ultimately be resolved or settled however/in some way, as opposed to being left injust and wrongful forever - as the universe typically involves multiple complimentary (typically, therefore, inverted) sides (however many).

One would have come about in one's existence as a reality which one does not meaningfully experience, will not have existed: what one does not experience, does not exist meaningfully for one. Though the outer/physical reality's existence could be inferred, something that actually is only really exists as it is being experienced - coming into the full fruition of being manifested. So all that actually is experienced/perceived, always/invariably is within the context of the psyche/inner (perception) of an observer. The more persistent or universally universal something is, the more fundamental it could be. One's present form and reality/iteration of existing/existence would be a more conditional manifestation of the process of one's being (confronted with one's own being): nothing lasts forever, things change over time. This inner/psyche(: the 'window' that is one's perspective that its perceptual fabric comprises), however, also is rooted in the physicality/outer as that is more the more persistent/significant type of form/manifestation - and so is therefore what ends up getting experienced more, so is more invariably; suggesting this more persistent/significant: physical, also serves as a fundament. All in all, the outer doesn't only contain and so encompass one, but this 'mainframe' that is one's perspective - which is intelligence/life/intimacy-manifesting so wielding so bearing, and seems to, in its primary nature, be frequency(: energetic)/resonance/harmonic-based throughout both inner and outer - also encompasses the outer. The inner and outer are indeed connected, for example: they also are in contact when one controls one's body/embodiment - both inner and outer reaching into - being reflected in - one another. Since we are beings that originate from the inner world, which is what the fact one's inner nature may contradict the outer dynamics - us having to learn to get used to those sometimes - would show.

That which (ultimately) is behind the creation of one's spirit, should also be behind creating the reality - as the two are integrally compatible.
This is also displayed by the fact that we are so innately dependent on the conditions provided to us by nature, such as being able to breathe the air, having enough other organisms such as plants or other animals besides us that we could consume, there being drinkable water, and the atmosphere being of livable temperatures - to name a few examples. Additionally, personally, we use many instruments that others have devised for us, like the alphabet, calendar, or really any type of technology one didn't personally invent oneself that one might be using, like a computer or the internet - as examples. So, the extend to which our lives are intertwined with the surrounding circumstances, indicate that our coming into existence is not something that we perform in absolute isolation - and, also since we posses a form of intelligence, that would be an indication that one's life is not a mere random coincidental event that arises without there being any form of intelligence behind it, so beyond it - backing it.

'You' are a branching continuity of (a) being(: a 'family tree' or lineage/ancestry). One's body is a 'communal union' of micro-organisms, that stays in dynamic communication with one another using the blood circulation - (that emerged from a sort of pressure that originated from the fusion energy of at least our Sun and towards the core of the Earth, being a sort of pressure of more competent forms drowning out the less competent ones where the better prepared form wins and gets to procreate, and thus in that from the past is created a prediction for the future) that, using one's auric field (or the collective auric influence of one's physical body), tries to come to a perspective with as means the anticipating the outside world as well as possible.

Both senses and thinking operate by tuning into vibrational, mathematically-structured fields. Like one's eyes/vision-instrument(s) are the resonating/interacting of one's bodily matter with light, and one's ears/hearing-instrument(s) with sound vibrations(: vibrations in the air), one's thinking would be resonating/interacting with a deeper field of frequencies(: 'waves' or 'sound', being: mental 'sound') performing mathematics (perhaps based on proportion and resonance, or algorithmically, or otherwise still) - conducted through the complex systems the intelligence inhabits and comprises (its cells and stuff).

(Seeming) granularity would be an emergent phenomenon, emerging from gradients with specific boundary conditions (for example: like the peak and through of a wave can minic binary systems, representing either of the supposed binary digits - as does the presence or absence of an electron, which is wave-like, in a transistor of a computer represents the binary digits in computing) as come forth from (the intervals of) the physical constructions that make up frequential resonances/dissonances - forming a granular framework, being expressed through the fluctuation that makes it there is a boundary(-condition). As such, there would be no indivisible unit, being a single one of those grains. So, more complexity may be fractally embedded within what would first seem to be less complexity (as a basic example: a coastline appearing to become more and more complex as one zooms in, or what seems to be one particle at first then containing many smaller elements - so fractal embedding; or: one might not be aware of the scope of our universe, and as such be unaware of our planet or even galaxy being part of something much bigger). These levels of lower seeming complexity could then manifest influences from - such as by [coherently] 'aligning'/'resonating' (with) - higher levels of complexity. One's 'thinking'/awareness would be of a 'higher- fractal order' than one's solid substance/matter(-embodiment). Life as we know it(: in a physical embodiment) would appear when certain conditions within complex systems allow sustained/coherent, adaptive(: also allowing for feedback), and organized/coherent activity. Life would arise in our outer reality(: the dimension/reality we presently occupy in our physical existence) as the outer's energetic systems align with certain configurations of energy also representing these higher dimensions, thus aligning with that and so manifesting/conducting its life. So, life (as we know it: in physicality/the outer) would be (an expression that would be) possible through (alignment with) the dynamics of complex systems. All in all, as granularity would emerge from gradients, complexity would be able to have more complexity embedded into it. Coherence/alignment is the condition that enables higher-order principles to be expressed through lower-order systems: things working together would conduct something greater than the sum of their parts, like a body conducting life. Coherence allows patterns across higher and lower (fractal, scalar) orders/dimensions to align/resonate (also invoking mutual feedback), allowing properties of life to arise as an expression within the outer through structural and dynamic compatibility between levels of organization; this compatibility meaning they were based on the same fundamental 'language' (if you would)/premise/'order' of things - which, for the physical aspect of our existence, could be something along the lines of mathematics - and something like something sincerity-based for the remaining part: that which is intrinsic to ourselves as beings. Awareness can be seen as a higher-(/different- or extra-)dimensional fractal 'scalar' order(s) of complexity that manifests through nested, 'smaller-order'(: less encompassing/with a smaller scope: towards the 'branch', as opposed to towards the 'trunk' or 'root' of the tree, being our universe) complex systems (like cells or neural networks) embedding and resonating with these higher-dimensional orders. These 'lower order' systems would express and align with the patterns of the grander(: the more encompassing scope-having), enabling emergent subjective experience. Coherent alignment would embeds higher-order principles with lower-order systems, enabling nested emergent properties (derived from something more intrinsic to and deeply entangled with our existence). Awareness would be higher-order complexity manifesting through nested smaller systems, whose resonating with it would enable subjective experience.

That the universe is something that is turning/tuning into itself as a self-reflective (recursive) structure would reveal, through pertruding into the field of experience, that the universe knows intimacy or can be personal. One may then ask if this quality of personality or intimacy was, in reality, always there - although not necessarily physically expressed. Ultimately, everything known - which as being that exists in actuality - exists within one's awareness/experience. Something that could never be experienced directly or inferred indirectly by anything living or anyone observing/perceiving, might as well never have existed: it did not have a meaningful(: meaning being the added value for an individual/someone) impact. If one were to remove conscious awareness or perception entirely, no distinction that actually exists or exists in actuality, would remain. This suggests that the observed is intrinsically tied to its observer: it was such a universe that could spawn us as individuals that would end up amounting to the functional laws of nature - that is to say, because we exist/because of our existing, that which would make/comprise the one looking back on existence (being: us), would end up being possible - as per the magic of imagination/an imaginative or generative force, it would seem or as would be apparant. This would mean consciousness is not a byproduct of matter, but rather would be the condition upon which existence is founded - in order to be known at all. Why would there not simply be nothing? Because nothingness does not exist - like a vacuum(ing)-force.
Because life is a perpetual self-learning mechanism, life is literally playing within itself. Life/existence becomes things algorithmically, being modes of energy.
We likely stem from an intelligence that perhaps had a will to marry the substance. This intelligence could be towards the 'trunk' or 'root' of 'the tree', where we could be a(/the) branch(es), pertruding into the physicality/physical dimensionality from higher dimensions.

During moments of intricate splendor or subsequent alignment(s)/coincidence(s) (for example: 'too much' that works well at the same time [for it to be considered mundane or ordinary because of how improbable it would otherwise be]), one can see in that, that it was 'created by' - in the sense of being in alignment with - (towards) the encompassing principle of the universe - or 'is of God's making'(: 'God' in the sense of ultimate meaningful alignment, as opposed to the apparent discrepancy/misalignment manifested in this reality - which may become apparent through, at the very least seemingly, meaningless suffering). At such moments, what may be striking is that things (at least appear to) work together more deeply than - or would be more integrated beyond - what's immediately apparant [to the naked eye, without further/deeper investigation] in the outer physical reality, such as this being a greater (in terms of magnitude of meaningfulness and the scope - and therefore scale, also in terms of the depth of its embeddedness in the reality - of what it would have taken to have allowed for such alignment to have come forth) aspect or facet of the reality/(more) integrated (and therefore more intrinsic to the reality than our perspective on the reality of apparently manifested discrepancies/misalignment such as potential difficulties or 'misattunement', as this integrated layer has to have been integrated more deeply/into deeper layers of the reality in order to function such that everything is inherently harmonized with it: towards the 'root' of the reality as opposed to the 'branches') layer being or acting as though it possesses an intelligence or acting coherently and meaningfully (and therefore having a 'recognition' or compatibility with what things/events/occurrences would mean to us hardwired in it): because, during these moments of splendor, things are catered to the way you experience things, this shows that this layer responds to/as it were seems to 'understand' (the) meaning (things may have to you) - and so behaving as an encompassing and more deeply integrated principle/force: when these coincidences/alignments have to do with you and something/someone outside of you (which may be the case in addition to solely encompassing one's own inner) one could see this force perform as an encompassing principle.
It seems to me all intelligence in the universe embodies this divine intelligence in its existence or could conduct(/be conductive to) it, such as through aligning with natural principles in a fruitful way - such as in (constructive) mutual positive reinforcement, or such as in aligning with something known as the 'Tao' or the 'force' (from the 'Star Wars'-movies) - basically: (respecting the spontaneous or organically occurring, as opposed to being based on pre-set mental programming, for example - through) minimal interference (in the surroundings: opposing what wants/tends to happen as little as possible and in that sense going the way of least resistance) such as through responding to urgency - and in that rush (potentially) letting your judgement get clouded by partiality/egotistical self-interest, for example. Aligning with natural principles could also mean: bring aware of certain natural principles, or in a more concrete way something like setting yourself or others and/or things up in a productive way.

Such a coincidence as can be seen carrying 'God's signature' could also be: that life has come about on Earth because the Sun and the Moon emulate a proportioned alignment/proportion, being a 'symmetrical' yet 'polar opposite' reflection of one another: symmetric in the sense that both appear just as large because the moon is about 389 times closer to Earth and also is about 400 times smaller - even though they are polar opposites in terms of their size compared to Earth. So: opposites coming together in a balanced/harmoniously proportioned way/proportion. As if being a reflection of one another: a proportioned reflection. The impact that caused the tilt in Earth's axis and caused the moon to form - by tilting Earth - has caused us to have seasons, which - among other things - have facilitated life. (In addition, the tides - which are influenced by the Moon - could have contributed the arising of early biological rhythms or nutrient mixing.) Point being that it was a complex going together of circumstances, and as such was something of great coincidence/alignment to occur. God's signature would be in that we exist because the reality is sublime, and the reality could only be that reality, because that's the only reality that could end up being if something were to exist - and non-existence is non-existent. Something existing is intimately connected to the existence of an observer/experiencer: something only exist as it does in one's actual experience, within one's inner psyche - which is the only way reality shall really ever be seen/experienced, and so has any way of ever having a meaningful impact. So, as we exist, reality would be sublime - and so the reality that we see would have come about through this same sublimeness - or it couldn't have come about. This also ties back to the greater intelligent layer of the universe, which comes about through reality being sublime (as someone exists) - but also because it might just be that through this intelligent force or this hand behind the reality (like life is like a setup or 'rigged' game in that there is a deeper unifying hand behind the reality than may be apparent - "nothing is what it seems", as the saying goes): the intrinsic root behind the imaginitive fabric of the universe, reality could actually have come about. This exist through sublimeness, which exists through someone existing - so things amounting or adding up to the sublimeness of reality realizing what actually is (in one's experience). This sublimeness, which exists through the intelligence at the root, carries 'God's signature' (or would be of the making of the intelligence of the Universe) because it exists by means of an individual (and its spontaneously creating imagination/'imaginitive fabric') existing - and this individual would induce this sublimeness/the quality of 'carrying God's signature', because only through that beauty it could exist - so the reality in which it would exist(: existence) would have all the necessary elements to amount or add up to this reality existing; hence this splendor carries 'God's signature' or 'the (creative) individual's signature' - which would then be beautiful because only through that alignment/intelligence could something exist, and everything that manifests in the imaginative fabric of the reality, that which happens to exist, would always amount to a situation where its existence would have arisen.
What ultimately is right and what is wrong? (This could be a rather fundamental question to our experience.) Respecting free will (for each individual), so autonomous self-governance, or where there exists a feedback-structure where the experiencer/receiver can influence what is manifested/experienced - 'the consumer decides', as it were, would seem like a good pointer. Also free will in the sense of one not being confined in one's decision-making to wielding a disproportional degree of egotistical self-interest in relation to/upon being confronted with circumstantial urgencies. In the light of free will, it also has to do with equality in the sense of impartiality(: treating others the way you would want to be treated) - which is the nature of our sense of compassion (or the ability to put yourself in someone else's shoes).

Fabric/'cloud(s)'/volume(s)/field(s) of intelligence conduct/contain reality (which is experienced through, and comprised of, that) - where the greater field is like the 'trunk' of the tree, and where an experience of being [more] one with the other and interfacing with something that would ordinary be beyond oneself: perhaps connecting to more total/bigger aspects of oneself(: a branch, representing an individual in this example, also has the stem and trunk of the tree in it somewhere or is that to an extend) that has access to information most close and/or meaningful to one, and so with abilities that would ordinary be beyond what we consider to be possible - meaning it should have to do with the ability from/encompassing a larger scope of or within the greater universe - and has access to greater or deeper aspects of oneself (like aspects closer to oneself): the 'most' or highly sensitive and/or intimate of one's being being connected to this greater scope on/of existence (which we always, in part, on the root-/trunk-end of the tree making up one's being, are or contain in us somewhere, like the branch also is the root or trunk to an extend: not only are we of a lineage/ancestry/family tree, but also in the sense of us being highly dependent on outer circumstances in order to be alive, to say the least - such as the importance of having air to breathe) - with vulnerability comes innocence, as with power comes responsibility. In the sense of towards the source/a point or points of origin, or towards the root(s) of the tree in terms of the aspect pertaining to one as a person(: becoming one with the greater intelligence of the universe/yourself being greater as spanning more encompassing and deeply integrated scopes of our existence), fundamentally, what is ultimate/sublimized becomes you as you tap into more ultimate aspects of yourself - as well as the principle of: there is nothing but you, what else would there supposed to be? Fundamental principles are unconditional truths (like principles which are intrinsically ultimately the truth, or like physical laws which are coherent and consistent across vantage-points because these vantage-points share their foundation/founding principles from which the nature of its presence or being originates). This fundamental connection could perhaps access (meaningful-to-one-)information (like an 'all-', or rather 'intimately-seeing' eye/signal or channel of inquiry) through something like ultimately consistently self-similar coherent harmonious resonance producing oneness.
The (curvature of the) life we're living (that we're inhabiting) could very well be like a scripted setup/game with possible scenarios, which we would have, at one point, intended to participate in - dealing with rules such as specific rules and separation/division from/individualization in relation to the greater universe, perhaps for fun/meaningful added value in the form of valuable experiences, or a will to see how one would measure up, or manifest certain beautiful harmonics and/or scenarios, or attempting to learn to overcome certain challenges.
Our denser embodiment(s)/body or bodies towards being within(: directly participating in/interacting with) the curvature of this reality in which we are living our lives (such as would be the physical body, but also lower emotional/feeling-states are linked to being more subject to circumstances) is/are like the branches: being of more (at the very least seemingly, to the naked eye) separate nature, (also) because of it being increasingly impermeable and massive/heavy - this being a consequence of there being constructive harmonious resonance and so alignment/coherency to a lesser measure, and so there being a higher degree of discrepancy/misattunement/misalignment in total, giving rise to the dualities or polarized sides (however many) or differentiation (within, and of - so containing - that which is towards the encompassing totality) within which mutual oneness is a climax from which life springs indeed(: mates 'pairing'/connecting or 'becoming together/united as though one' to birth new life). This discrepancy manifests as separation between differentiations/different parts and so the arisal of polarization/polarized sides - which include the multiplicity of coordinates in any fabric or any volume (no matter holding what elements of any perception/sensation in whose mentality - and, so, like the arisal of time and space), imperfections provided by circumstances, or misfortune, and literal unconstructivity in the physical constitution or buildup of the reality itself that we perceive (in which we exist and perceived within/through our/one's existence) and lack of equilibrium or consequent coherence/stability of the form, as would come about from dissonance/self-interfering so self-destructive dissonance(s)(: a dissonant being a lack of harmonious proportion between the frequencies of the forms/reality manifestations).
The remaining fundamental and most deeply rooted alignment manifests, for example, as (any) intelligence/coherent or intelligent forces, or as alignments within our universe such as the precise perfection in the tuning of the universal constants, or there being no general naturally occurring genetic mishaps in (the) evolution (of life), or the implicit order implied by the direction of spin of entangled quantum particles to always remain correlated (or 'linked' by always remaining one another's opposite in terms of the direction of the spin of the particle), no matter how far apart they are, instantaneously, when measured - even though they seem to be subject to the seemingly chaotic circumstances in our reality/the universe through interaction with it (- not by sending super-fast signals, but by having been 'pre-aligned' or 'pre-positioned' from the moment the entangled particles, being different sides of the same polarization, differentiate - splitting up); this showing that they originate from the same intrinsic constituting principles and natural laws regarding the engineering of their forms and structures/geometries, and such.

There could be more to existence, or making up existence, than our present circumstances. What some might call 'God' could also (in part) be (more or increasingly fundamental) conditions beyond, or encompassing - for example: that which preceded or the point of origin of-, or that which encompasses (at least in time) - our present reality/circumstances, also being of and in/through other realities/circumstances of, or facets to existence. One's being could also be part of, or facilitated by, an intelligence: an (energetic) network (that arises along with other energetic networks or structures), which would be, or exist through, fabric of-, and so be part of, this being('s awareness). This could (at least in part) be facilitated by forces that (at least parts of) this manifests, with which particles might 'resonate'/interact - being (part) of (or directly or indirectly/ultimately originating from) this. Through finding fundamental principles and universal consistencies in or throughout (facets of our) reality/existence, we may get closer to those of what conditions encompass/would be beyond our present circumstance(s)/reality. So there could be something beyond our present reality/circumstance(s). So: other facets of existence (where, mentally/as spirits/as individuals, beyond one's solid physical body, might originate from: living beings as we know them being a marriage or resonating of matter, or more broadly: networks/structures (of energy), and fields. Where we as beings ultimately originate from and the reality we presently experience might be from different places or have the same direct origin, but all should be from the same ultimately preceding or encompassing origin indirectly: one's (own) existence (at least in a fundamental sense, and not necessarily in the form of the present manifestation or expression of one's fundamental existence, being one's present circumstances or realities of one's living and life). This is because there is no existence without a someone/'you', and so there will not have been no 'you' beyond this present circumstance because otherwise existence would be finite - and that would make existence illogically limited. Even if the present reality or circumstance would end, there could pop up another facet of existence: an observer might exist somewhere else, making it that what is 'seen'/perceived(: an interrelation, and in that sense interaction, with any such thing) is still inside/exists through a (form of a) psyche, mind, inner. Like the fabric comprising one's inner and the fabric comprising the outer, there would be different facets of reality (with different structures and of different constructs) in interaction with one another (which one can derive from the fact that what one sees is not necessarily the physical reality). These facets could share fundamental principles or similarities at the root, which they (directly or indirectly/ultimately) originate from. The physical/outer is in interrelation and interaction with one('s inner) (apparently, as in there being existence in the form of the experience/perception/sensing of a reality, or there being life). A point that would be notable is that one's(: inner) or the(: outer), or really any conceivable reality, is something that one 'sees', or perceives, through/within the fabric of/comprising one's awareness: there are different layers of fabric or facets to the perceived reality. One's awareness is linked to/in contact with the fabric(s) of its content(s) (one way or another). This awareness/the fabric of or comprising one's experience may be 'home to' or interact with different realities or facets of existence. They should all, either directly or indirectly/ultimately, have the same (type of) origin, to the extend that things are part of the same framework. And even if they do not seem to be part of the same framework and/or there does not seem to be any interaction or great likeness between them (hypothetically) - thus not seeming to be part of the same integral whole, which cannot be the case as everything shares the fact it actually exists and therefore is real, making it part of the same framework of being experienced by one in some way - if there is a form of an observer in that reality/universe, there once again is a 'you'/(some)one/individual/being that is sensing (in whatever way, shape or form), rendering it part of the same framework of one's consciousness/awareness/inner/experience. This could perhaps be through the same fabric of one's inner awareness at a different time, or perhaps through different kind of fabric or manifestation of an inner awareness of one - yet, for example, tapping into similar, or like, energy-dynamic(s)(: perhaps a way different form of manifestation of - yet following/tapping into - the same principle) creating this awareness/experience/sensation (such as, perhaps, a resonating/interacting/intermingling of different densities or frequencies or fields/facets or fabrics of existence, like in that interaction forming a mutual feedback-connection between them) - which requires (a) one, that would then be fundamental beyond our current reality as a manifested commonality across/similarity between the different realities within one's experience or facets of existence, or a principle they share in showing (though perhaps manifested in entirely different ways, shapes, forms or manifestations), because of common(ality in) encompassing/pre-existing conditions. Since one entails different fabrics/structures (like experiential/inner and physical/outer), and since there is always 'one' sensing throughout any experienced reality (that actually exists, as it actually is being experienced: something that can never be experienced might as well never have existed), the personal aspect/facet of this existence should be more fundamental than its (outer) expression(s)/manifestation(s)(: these, at least individually, being less permanent/more momentary and less universal or more conditional than the fundamental or ultimate reality regarding the nature of one's being).

The [metaphorical] 'sound'-oriented/'tone'-based or frequential/wave-technical (including as pertaining to [within] one's inner [perception]/psyche) has more to do with the inner: the experiential/psychic or mind-aspect/element/facet of one's experience, or 'fabric' comprising one's experience/inner/psyche/mind - as opposed to towards the outer physical becoming more/increasingly object-oriented/based [at least at our scale]. Art - or something like bird-song - is the expression of this 'sound'-oriented or 'waves'/frequency-related aspect in/through the objects or outer expressions (to facilitate a pleasantly/harmoniously resonating of the inner - given that tastes might differ, though there can be pinned down laws or beauty like harmonious ratios and physically harmoniously resonating harmonics, which will generally be found pleasant in one's perception because they resonate harmoniously with one's own bodily structures as they align with the fundamental ratios/harmonics of the structures found in nature). Thinking/scriptural logic is more object-based than, say, bird-song - so is the expression/encoding of [references to] the object-based in the experiential(: deriving their speech-related meaning from being interpreted - which happens through one's thinking and therefore using one's inner psyche/experience - this way) 'tones'/sounds: like sounds one can make with one's mouth. What separates humans from other animals, insects and plants is that they don't have ways to express their inner thinking in the outer using this code, let alone write it down to have make it more permanent and lasting, and in that sense solid, across a longer time - also having to do with the fact that, generally, they also don't have thumbs to utilize utensils with. More practical artificially created forms(: created by humans) would be more object-based. A slight sidenote regarding beauty in outer expressions: more humble or practical forms could also be found to be beautiful, because of the inner intention/mentality associated with it or that it would attest to. Visually, nature tends to be beautifully sublime. Additionally, in terms of character/intention/wielded inner harmonics, generally (and exceptions aside), animals and insects tend to be harmonious and intimate in the sense of being rather innocent and sincere. Humans also are born innocent and generally sincere, to which the fact that actual physically witnessed violence tends to naturally traumatize individuals. Again, bird-song also tends to be beautiful or have a sound of sincerity in it (even if it is meant to impress or serves another practical purpose as well). This reveals the fact that naturally, things are not just object-based, but indeed also sounding- or tone-based - which would be what the experiential works using, and is fundamental to the physical (and so to the object-based that then emerges from it). What those two aspects of reality have in common is that they're based on energy(-densities, or extends to which it is tense/hard/impermeable/massive or relaxed/soft/resonant/light), frequency(: curved- and/or spiral-based geometries such as spinning, oscillations objects, often being spherical- or - embodying the complimentary sides - torus-structures: with opposing spirals spinning around a center, this center being a still point like the eye of a hurricane (hurricanes also exhibiting torus-like properties), forming a continuous self-sustaining loop. This torus form often arises, because it is the most efficient way for different densities to intermingle or interchanged (for example: a spiraling stick will travel up a current, so it can easily alleviate/neutralize the tension of the movement, thus opposing it - meaning it is able to easily divert it rather than succumbing to it because of a lack of ability to divert/neutralize it, that would result in resistance when trying to oppose or not be subject to the current).

Because you see things from your perspective, following cause and effect, your subjective experience of the reality would start with yourself, meaning: with your initial condition, and not anyone you grow into. Because of this, the experiential psychic/inner mainframe: the context within one's mind/psyche by which one's experience is enclosed or encompassed, and the fabric within that through which one perceives the throughput of one's any sense, which are the sensations one perceives/you experience - might be more fundamental than that which is perceived through it: the outer world, which is reflected in our inner world, and is literally looking 'from the outside in' instead of 'from the inside outwardly' - this opposition in multi-dimensional directionality also manifests in the sense of the mirroring/inversion of the (complimentary) fundamental natures each is based on from its own perspective : our solid-substance (let's say: 'massive') aspect being more dependent on survival of the fittest, and from our inner perspective starting with an inherently innocent standpoint so spiritually sound way to be - this intimacy (like one would be at ease when excludingly observing their own private self) - as an inherent inherent to the presence of any individual, at least to an extend in some of the worst moral cases: someone with a more healthy conscience is to have more genuine sincerity and peace of mind/'harmony with the silence'; note that in principle/generally/in overwhelming majority, animals seem to have more child-like (yet sometimes wiser in matters of the feeling) and sweet(/intimate/innocent) characters than humans - who experience an 'older signal' as our species has achieved to point to and encode our inner thoughts into outer(: physical) manifestations, allowing us to communicate and solidify our assertations, making them more permanent - also hence: 'older signal' - which enables our species to pre-plan things and boosts our logical reasoning. As we manifest this logical reasoning into the behavioral structure that makes up human society - based on mental structures - we could begin to deviate from spontaneity, 'maturing' one mentally: 'older signal'. One's inner spiritual intuitive nature: from which we originate as we're born like that, versus the practical behavior we grow into - the former being of a 'younger' quality, and the latter being of an 'older' or more 'matured' quality in terms of deteriorations of one's child-like innocence in the becoming more powerful and cunning.

Psychic activation could, broadly, entail perceptions and causal effects or reasonings which do not belong to the world of solid objects and its visible (to the naked eye) linear causality. The perceptions are of a different layer or 'dimension' to reality: perceptions within one's mind/hallucinations - though those may be triggered by energetic conditions around one that one could become sensitive to as one becomes more sensitive to subtle perceptions upon 'psychic activation'/activation of one's full mind, including intuitive faculties beyond linear reasoning/opening of one's 'third eye' - if you would. Perceived causal connections would often involve things acting as one pertaining to one: introducing an additional layer/'dimension' to things of interrelation. The perceptions may also be involved in the conceived causal interrelations.

On LSD, one typically experiences 'the connected experience': where the reality gets - and is subject to - a spiritual layer through which spirits speak through psychic states, hallucinations and coincidences - that connects one to the rest of the cosmos across distances and dimensions. Because of this, one becomes - as it were - plugged into deeper core-layers of the reality and (therefore) yourself. One may get in touch with what sincerely matters to one(: one becomes more connected to the core of one's being, one may experience interconnectedness with the reality (across distances or with animals) through energetic connections/interrelations (be prepared for others to mistakenly call these events mere coincidences out of a lack of understanding/ignorance), one may experience striking coincidences - which touch on the more omnipotent quality of the spiritual/psychic layer that also makes it one considers if it is a more core-element/layer of the reality that one is then connected to with one's being.

Psychic activation may entail interrelation(s) between one as a person and/or what happens in one's inner, and the outer - through, for example, mutual feeling/thinking among beings and/or things seeming to respond to the same/similar energetic conditions as that one may be perceiving/experiencing; this at least seeming to reveal an apparent connection. This (seeming) connection becomes apparent through what would otherwise make for unusually coincidental alignment(s). So, this would indicate a layer and/or field(s) of psychic/mental/energetic forces underlying the reality, linking/connecting beings - and even able to energetically influence things within it. Forces (of any kind - also like: psychic/energetic forces) could work through this psychic layer energetically, which could influence one( another)'s thinking/feeling (and through this also the reality, indirectly), and could also alter what one senses(: so-called hallucinations).

The energy has harmonics, is of a certain (combination of) tones: frequencies. Also, there is a certain timing of events. Like in the case of a feeling of timing, or 'imagined' energy - which sensation would be a consequence of the interpretation of the experiencer - could come into fruition because of one's ideas or intents configuring/directing (subconsciously, at times or when psychically activated, as or directed by what one imagines - to an extend; especially if one really thinks something to be the case: your mind could be like a supercomputer, which one could instruct) one's feeling-energy and/or the energy in one's body. Energy can also be influenced by emotional response or state - including one's general subconscious, or momentary and apparent, emotional state/inner harmonic/feeling-energy - and one's mental constructs: one's ideas, whether consciously held or subconscious ones. In this way, any mentally perceived feeling, as would come about from the implication/imitation of its, or its actual, presence in one's experience/perception - whether in the form of a visualized illusion, or a feeling of rythm and/or harmonics (any tone/frequency, whether inner or outer): like music, or, say, visually matching colors, or ratios in geometric composition - would/could be felt (also with/in the body)/perceived (also in one's mental interpretation), could manifest or manifests or finds its reflection in one's feeling/energy(-body/system) - which may be felt mutually.

The mind has the capacity to link reasoning to occurrences/events, and based on/according to(/or in concurrence with) one's thought-processes(: or thoughts/beliefs/assumptions one has about the reality). When becoming more psychically activated, the psyche begins to manifest psychic energetic phenomena, spontaneously and/or based on one's reasoning/thinking (that could create perceived coincidence as well - as well through the energy one communicates subconsciously or gives off) influencing the spirit and way in which things would (turn out to) manifest, that corresponds to what one could feel with/in one's psyche/thinking(: inducing a certain presence or state of mind; in other words: the psychic atmosphere), and one's body(: in the form of an energetic resonance/feeling/metaphorical 'sound'/'resonance' or perhaps 'dissonance' in a negative case) one feels/configuration of energy within/directing and as such comprising one's 'aura'/feeling-fabric/energetic body, or electricity in, around one's nerves or body - that could be felt, sometimes coming from a specific location within what one sees; which presence that may be felt: auric energy. And this may influence the instrument that conducts what one experiences(: one's awareness) manifesting as hallucinatory effects (like shapes and forms, or colors, and lights or dark shapes and spots) by influencing the psychic energetic fabric and processing of the perceived volume, manifesting as presences/energetic phenomena(: like a pleasant feeling of electricity of the nerves with the body - also, for example, at the end of one's psychic-energetic 'nerves' or energetic currents comprising the bodily energetics: the electricity which comprises one's energetic body, including below/at the end of one's feet and at the end of one's glance, for instance - like in when you feel what you see both at the same time as well as coming from the same area/spot creating a perceived presence, along with a state of being it may induce: such as of a tranquil silence induced a good-feeling feeling within one's body coming from somewhere outside of you, and as influencing one's perception/manifesting as hallucinating/hallucinations that one may be able to see/hear/feel/perceive as such, coming about from - for example - spikes in, or exotic, energies/energetic configurations; so, one's hallucinations can be directly connected to the feeling you can feel/perceive: spiritual energetics). Hallucinations may manifest as/come about from a certain specific focussing of one's gaze that usually presents itself. All in all, the psyche/mind makes energetic phenomena take place or invents energetic phenomena based in and one's (or someone else's) reasoning, manifesting a psychic energetic atmosphere, which may be perceived by the senses hallucinatorily through influencing the perceptional organ, and which can be felt in and around one's nerves/body: what one might call an energetic psychic 're(a)sonance' - as per wordplay.
(Feeling-)energy (that one could feel with one's body) could obstruct and/or work against, or complement and work in favor of, one's aura/the feeling/energy in/of one's body - or the tones of one's feeling: one's energy or vibe. This also goes for one's breath(ing): how well you're able to breathe through/into the surroundings/surrounding feeling - wether it's obstructed or not.

The psychic energy of one's mind: the energy in and around one (that one's mind/awareness and thinking manifests) can induce states of awareness and influence/alter one's perception - and (this) can be felt in what you see. When you feel what you look at these may reinforce one another and as such produce a new state of awareness/manifest as influenced perception in one's consciousness. For example: it may give off a very nice 'well-rounded'/light feeling in terms of a tingly energy, as you're looking at it. All the while, the sense of perspective may change and you begin seeing things, get a different perception, begin to (what is commonly referred to as) 'hallucinate', or become 'psychically activated', as you begin to see the more subtle realm(s) of energies as your psyche reaches new energetic states (inducing the feeling and state of awareness).
Also, animals may appear to respond to one's psychic energy/thinking (or reasoning/conclusions one takes) or the state of being/awareness or aura: your energetic state of being, of the psyche and of the body. Your thinking/(act of) perception and the energy, with a feeling to it, that it manifests.
This psychic energy, as it comes about from the activity of one's mind/psyche, may be influenced by, for example: loud noises - as this influences the psyche conducting the energy - or (sudden) movements or people standing in one's/around aura, influencing your presence with their presence.

We have a physical body and an energy (bodily electricity-)body with multiple layers of lower and higher energetic frequencies, with a lower frequential lower-emotion feeling-body and a higher frequential ethereal light-body - each part of frequencies of their own fields. This energy-field, which is the field of the energy of the psyche (with the lower frequencies being a heavier coalescence of the energy of this field), connects you to mentalities (through the psyche), with the higher frequencies allowing for a broader reach and lower frequencies for a more narrow reach - meaning that an overactive lower emotional body or obstructed higher ethereal light body would make you more susceptible to reacting to the impulses at hand rather, as opposed to the inner peace and tranquility provided by the ethereal light field promoting one's own free will. The energy field may harbor a non-linear recording of (the totality of) events. The higher reality would be one of greater beauty, which lives at the higher frequencies of this energy-field: a psychic(: telling from the fact it brings forth life - and in the sense of the fabric of reality being one of a psychic fabric, like an - as it were - 'psyche' of an encompassing organism) morphic field underpinning reality.

When you're hallucinating, when focussing on the hallucination - not looking away, keeping your head and limbs as still as possible, and keeping your vision as constant as possible (perhaps even limiting your blinking) - the hallucination may become more realistic, expand, begin to do things/move (including spinning), intensify, or begin to accumulate over time. (This will most likely happen naturally, as you're seeing and focussing on the hallucination, or giving it your attention.) The same goes for a sudden change in perspective and/or the accumulation of visual effects such as the intensified visual snow: when you hold still it may intensify and lead to new or other hallucinatory effects/presences/manifestations. Other hallucinations (like sudden lights or dark spots) could happen in the blink of an eye, and hallucinations will most likely present themselves spontaneously - or such as moments where a presence is invoked by someone, or certain manifestations or expressions. A different mental/psychic state of being or energetic resonance/configuration, will invoke different states of perception.

Like with everything, what you end up hallucinating will also depend on whether one's intention is based in sincerity, both in the moment and overall. This determines the spiritual/moral quality (or intactness) of the mental/psychic state of being or energetic resonance that is involved in this psychic interaction (also: 'beauty is in the eye of the beholder', as the saying goes). Like moments of joy/sincerity can be healing, immoral things can misconfigure one's being: in one's thinking, feeling-wise/energetically/aurically - and/or physically (immediately or eventually).

When someone begins to hear or see things, what makes this an energetic 'interaction' is that one's energy signature comes forth from the interrelation with others/things, making up one's energetic configuration.

As living beings, we seem to all be connected to an energetic network or field through which we seem to be interrelated - including beyond our immediate surroundings through the psyche/thoughts about others(: like loved ones)/things(: 'energy signatures'). So: any energies(/energy signatures) one might be interfacing with psychically(: in your mind, through thought - like what/who you're thinking about, one's thought-processes), as well as energies coming from the surrounding. This energetic interrelation would commonly be felt subconsciously. A substance like Speed may intensify one's energy as well as, as well as may dramatically raise the frequency of one's (mind/psychic) energy - substances like ketamine and LSD would do this as well - and thus create all kinds of weird unusual energetic interrelations with the surroundings, for example(: like feeling out of place when walking into a public place - or getting an eerie feeling, like you're on a more sensitive frequency than others). What could happen when sober as well, is that in interaction with others one's feeling about something could subconsciously influence someone else's feeling - say, when you have a mutual feeling of timing, or something else. Others have the capacity to respond to one's thoughts intuitively, through a subconscious mutually shared feeling. One may, commonly subconsciously, be interacting with forces around one: get a certain feeling, perhaps feeling addressed by something/someone - maybe even hearing a voice - or feeling like you're in an energetic interrelation with others or noises around you: perhaps even incurring or direct hallucinations(: voices, seeing or feeling certain things) and thought-processes.

 • One time, on LSD with my friends, we were sitting in a room. There was one person I was particularly interested in. I watched him and got the idea that maybe I can make him feel something by the back of his head if I would try to feel something there. I tried to put energy where I wanted him to feel it, and suddenly he startledly turned his head looked at the wall behind him.
(You can read this true story, and my other testimonies, on: Ivo Actual Reality.)

Somehow/subconsciously, he got the impulse to look behind him - though most likely he would not have guessed that it was literally someone's focused intent that was directing him. Similarly, the way someone's subconscious energy/energies interrelate with yours, may have an influence on you - even, or particularly, without anyone's conscious intent.

Important to note, once more, is: 'others' can also include animals (or even insects and plants - in other words: any living being).
Regarding states of mind incurring hallucinations - on LSD, for example: I also mean that when looking at, say, a cat, one may suddenly slip into a trance-like state where one suddenly feels a calmth, and actually subtly sees this cat's state of awareness by one's visual perception becoming subtly influenced: like seeing everything slightly differently, like seeing slightly more contrast, being able to see very sharp, or - if you keep still and focus a bit longer - begin to see the cat as a tiny leopard (along with other visual effects occurring, like intensified visual snow).

From one's body come connections as per electrostatic resonating with electrostatic areas around/surrounding one - being a sort of electrostatic connection to electrostatic areas around one; these being correlated to energy one feels within one's body and head (also mentally): these electrostatic connections coming from all over the body. This may be why some more sensitive people experience 'interference' from people around them (also such as them making disrupting noises at inconvenient times - such as one of great concentration or relaxation - which may sometimes be so precisely made at that specific inconvenient moment, that they could seem deliberate - or at the very least seem to be the consequence of this other making the noise subconsciously responding to one's energy in a sort of energetic 'territorial' dispute, where this other would feel a subconscious urge to go do something which then would end up making the noise as a consequence of them subconsciously feeling confined by energetic interference originating from the spike in your energy-levels; whether that would actually be the case or not). These force-fields would also be connected to one's breathing, where one's breathing could cause the feeling of blockages in-, or very light well flowing, energy - or where one's feeling causes one to breathe into such an energetic blockage, or having a very light-feeling breath or breath that is very tranquil or coming with a reassuring sound-wise 'tone'/'note' - making for a feeling of closure (with the nose or mouth in a certain position to make for the forthcoming 'sound' of that 'reassuring'-sounding breath). One could breathe 'over', behind or beyond a potential blockage, by breathing with a slightly more 'transparent'/'well-balanced' or 'well-rounded'/more 'fleeting' or 'zoned out' feeling, allowing the breath to 'ignore'/surpass the blockage and go behind it - as if going/having gone through it (protrudingly), coming from you and going to that spot and back to you as you breathe. Smoking or vaping may also have an energetic effect. When psychically activated, such as on Speed, even others may - at the very least seem to - respond to one's breathing. This has happened to me personally at least twice: my neighbor's kid at least seemed (to me) to respond to the way I vaped - where I, without thinking about it/spontaneously, did a sort of 'trick' where I first exhaled a certain way, and then proceeded to hold some remaining vapor in my lungs (so not exhaling completely), to then exhale the rest in a more 'well-rounded' way: in a way that causes a more 'well-rounded' feeling. As I did this, the neighbor's kid next-door (we could not see one another as our backyards are separated by a wall, so I could hear him - and as I wasn't making any noise in particular, he will probably not even have known I was sitting there facing the yard within my own home, specifically) seemed to make a noise that first would seem to signify a suprise of something going just right at the last moment, as if responding to the way the breating felt in the body (also in terms of alleviating 'blockages'/resistance). Another time, I was visiting the coffeeshop (weed dispensary) - having pulled through a night on weed and Speed. I happened to be having quite heavy breathing at that moment as I just came from outside, having biked there on my bicycle. This caused me to be a little short on air inside, but I didn't want to breathe a lot and snot all over the place - and I also didn't want to be a mouth-breather. As I breathed a little bit through my nose, the pressure on my stomach got quite big. As it did with a surge of pressure, the guy behind the counter preparing my weed went "pff", having to blow out some air as if also feeling pressure on his stomach.
One might also burp up any potential blockages in one's stomach. Through popping [the inside of] one's ears - which one could do through chewing with one's (pre)molars, and through clearing the cavity behind the nose and against the back of one's throat, like as in using water/liquid or blowing one's nose - or sending an energetic shockwave through the cavity of one's ears/head (which I highly advice to only do when actually necessary, as one might wrongly reroute the energy from its natural flow to one's then artificially created one - so only do this in an emergency of you not feeling your head properly) one can reinstate/reinforce one's mental electrostatic 'force-fields' in and around one's head and the surroundings (who knows how far, as one's thinking can access energy far away from one - which electrostatic energy therefore penetrates through physical obstacles freely), for example: like when you feel your mental head-space is becoming too narrow or drowned out by other('s) (mental, originating from their psyches-)influence(s)/(mental) interference (like other people or potentially authorities, or authoritative figures - like someone one depends on making them feel small/scaring them out of their empowerment, or such). Nature, such as animals or even plants, tend to - nearly without exception/in principle (especially when their conditions allow it), as far as I can tell - be very gentle and well-mannered in this/the energetic respect(, for as far as they are not mosquitoes) (then again, I live in a very domesticized are without wild or preying animals/insects/spiders etc., except for mosquitoes during summer). On LSD, one's mind begins to 'speak to one' by beginning to show him/her 'realities', both to the senses: hallucinatorily, as giving one insights. So - like when using LSD and/or getting (more) in touch with one's psychic atmosphere - one may receive sudden spontaneous ideas/insights. Also, not only making one extemely sensitive to subliminal messages intended by others consciously or subconsciously without them being aware of it, which may manifest in neighbor's saying things among themselves which seem to pertain to you by being responses to your (inner) energetics/thinking or bearing resemblance to what you were thinking about in terms of the meaning of what they say - and sometimes by making subliminal messages (seem to) come through what others say, even one's that others did not intend (not even subconsciously - although this effect may make that seem to be the case) and there was no connection: like a mental nervous twitch. It will often happen in gradually that one goes from an actual seeming connection (where what is said becomes objectively highly coincidental compared to one's own being - where neither can see the other and the neighbors are not aware of you being there), to an illusory state - or the other way around: one's mind attempting to 'connect' to the 'collective conversation': psychically activating, because of the LSD one has consumed. This same thing may happen with animals showing themselves, or noises birds make - where they seem to respond to one's thinking, (inner) being or aura (also, such as when cleansing one's aura by, say, calming down and listening just that bit more closely to the silence around). Animals (like birds) may reveal themselves or make themselves known (or even come into your field of view from a distance) when one opens one's 'third eye'(: fully activates one's mind, also going beyond ordinary linear thinking and activating one's intuition and subtle intuitive perception - or even extrasensory perception of hallucinatory/mental or psychic manifestations): which may manifest as great concentration while thinking - fully activating one's mind; or as facilitated through clearing one's aura: using one's own energy (such as energy coming from your hands) to clear interference/blockages in one's energetic body.

If you look up at the sky, what do the stars tell you? Keep the hallucination of your being healthy.
When looking up at the stars - and this all happened to me personally - I began to see the most colorful beautiful colors in all kinds of random intricate patterns throughout my entire vision as a 2d-overlay of transparent intense colors running through one another very finely. When focusing on it for prolonged amount of time, suddenly a change occurred where I suddenly saw a gesture (made of like shades of dark gray made of the sparkly 'lights'/visual snow you see when you close your eyes) of like a woman who is tempting one by slightly lifting up her skirt. That's when I noticed I had stepped from the pure innocent sincerity of, like, (an) innocent animal-spirit(s) into more sleazy territory (I could imagine: so as to keep generating more pleasantness to keep the hallucintion behaving nicely, which must have been exhausted by me focussing intently on its beauty and not letting go for such a prolonged time) - which I found to be uncomfortable around my friends that I was with; so I quickly ignored the hallucination and looked elsewhere.
Naïve, unknowing, people could be mislead/tricked into 'giving up their free will'/'confining themselves' mentally through getting desensitized by the blatant drowning out the subtle. (On LSD - and this is what happens when the hallucination stops behaving nicely, one might begin to see like a repeating hallucinatory image of an ambulance whizzing by, annoying one while there is no indication of anything being wrong - or a hallucinatory tram heading for you, about to run you over; as both happened to me during an LSD-trip of mine. Or, in a yet worse case: feeling-/energetic triggers like visual hallucinations of knives being thrown at you, where you could 'feel the knives' in your hands - when I experienced this my friend Evert-Jan jokingly said: "that's the escape room', as if he knew what I was seeing/feeling - or rather: the feeling like you're burning your hands on electricity coming from/at the tip of your fingers, which has also happened to me during an LSD-trip.) Especially on Speed, when one tends to be more sensitive and therefore vulnerable as well: audio-triggers, which will attach and be conducted through the fabric of one's mind and feeling in one's brain being tuned in a disharmonious, shallow [in terms of taste, and also morally] and in a degenerated/destructive, as opposed to healthy/constructive, way - could occur in worst-case scenarios, being dangerous dire cases: like annoying repeating sounds or compulsive/involuntary thought-voices or lifelike voices, which will dig themselves into the energetic fabric of one's brain/mind through twitchy energetic movements if they get foot on the ground, through the fabric being tuned in a disharmonious, shallow - morally, and in terms of taste - way to where it is destructive to the resonance of one's mind, similar as when incurred by grave mistakes in the logic one derives one's conclusions from, and consequently one's thinking on a consistent and overall basis. This happens because these sounds being mental energetic movements through one's brain damage the mind energetically or 'sound-'/resonance-wise. Also keep in mind that any potentially good voices, like would be one's inner intuition, will not work through unnatural external thought-voices or lifelike voices. These voices occurring is a sign of over-extravertion of the tuning of one's (inner) being. One's inner intuition would give one insights more naturally, working more implicitly or introvertily: as silently as possible, and manifest as manifestations of your own thinking voice, where it feels like you're the one doing the thinking - though perhaps effortlessly. In the case one should suffer from extensive or even continuous involuntary compulsory external thought-voices or lifelike voices, firstly one should immediately go to sleep. My advice is to avoid seeking help from any authorities right away as unless absolutely necessary by your own independent voluntary decree. I say this because in their unknowing incompetence, authorities could potentially escalate the situation (as they did in my case) by treating one in an alienating fashion(: treating one like an idiot inside the confines of their office, perhaps for hours on end while not allowing one to leave - potentially making it increasingly difficult to adequately word your answers, as then happened to me the moment they began treating me like an idiot, which was right away - while I had been able to have very calm, collected and informative conversations with both my parents and the two police officers who mistakenly sent me there for a 'check-up' because I had consumed LSD, to - in their words - see if "I could still safely partake in traffic"). It is dangerous to not be able to express oneself adequately in conversation with "mental health" (as they would like to call themselves)-workers: they are there, in THEIR working environment, that is most likely a strange unexpected place for one to be, fully sober, working, so in a down-to-Earth-mode, on top of which they have come prepared to the situation with a full curriculum they have studied of information they have not experienced themselves but have received from written hearsay in their book(s), among which is the so called DSM-5: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition - which is like the 'Bible' of (and to) psychiatrists all over the world. - Psychiatrists with no actual personal experience regarding the having consumed of psychoactive substances incurring 'psychic activation', and so no experience with this 'psychic activation' whatsoever, believe in the information they read in the DSM-5 in like fundamentalists (because in their reasoning, if everyone in their entire established profession believes it from heresay, it should or must be true): rather believing their written hearsay when having to choose between that or contradicting first-hand testimony. So one should not ever contradict what they say, or you will most likely be deemed to have gone mad and will not be allowed to leave until you admit to their collective opinion - which is merely a collective opinion: the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA), is not based on irrefutable observational or physical facts (such as that, for example, an infectious diseases can be tied directly to pathogens - which would, for example, be a physically observable and verifiable fact). Instead, the DSM(-5) is consensus(/collective opinion)-based. It is built around patterns in behaviors observed in people. For the most part, these observations are only observed by their clan of (studiers of written hearsay, believing in this written hearsay in a fundamentalist way - even when contradicting first-hand observations coming forth from direct experience; thus investigating with the assumptions and bias - which I shall explain shortly - coming forth from the contents of this written hearsay-)"professionals", as they like to call themselves. These observations occur in a/their clinical and research settings, though reports from others are sometimes used via - as they like to call themselves - "professional" mediation. The reported experiences and the reported interpretation(s) of their causes are, by the so-called "professionals" or written hearsay-believers, merely listed as 'diagnostic' symptoms (which words mean: symptoms of an illness) and it is not considered wether these could provide an explanation for the experienced phenomena. Instead, they are - from the very start - seen and grouped as, and so assumed to be, non-valid symptoms of a disease, without further investigation or consideration of their potential validity - meaning that the conclusions the DSM-5 draws came about from its own assumptions, which it wielded in its grouping/categorization of events: therefore being a circular reasoning. Also, the DSM(-5) is not based on, say, irrefutable or objective/factual/physical measurement indicating biological states (so-called 'biological markers'): it is therefore described by said so-called "professionals" as a diagnostic tool, not a scientific theory.
The DSM(-5) is also solely based on occurrences of psychological human suffering: so since the DSM(-5) only considers cases of psychological human suffering, it likely sees all cases it considers from a more negative perspective or connotation - where the only cases it considers are the more 'negative' ones: the one where psychological human suffering would be involved. Where the DSM exclusively considers cases involving psychological human suffering, the DSM(-5) thusly is inherently biased (because, as the saying goes: "seek, and you shall find"), as the so-called professionals who have created the DSM(-5) have only considered those cases which they deem suitable for qualification (being those involving psychological human suffering, in this case), based on their earlier conclusions - which conclusions were derived from this partial selection, selected partially(: with pre-supposition in mind, based on pre-supposition, or biasedly).
Like mentioned, the DSM(-5) is based on what behaviors are commonly observed by the biased so-called "professionals", and clinical consensus: the collective decided-upon opinion among those who have first completed a long education to which they have dedicated their life, where they were instructed to internalize and believe (in a fundamentalist way) said biased written hearsay, and could only have graduated have they thoroughly internalized it, meaning it is likely these individuals will then see things following, and act from, the biases and pre-suppositions the education of their field has taught and told them is acceptable as per the clinical consensus, being the collective decided-upon opinion which was, once again, only formed only by those who have shown to follow, and are therefore likely to act on, the bias/pre-suppositions already present in the field - which originates from the investigations done with these biases and pre-subpositions, making for results that confirm these; ultimately resulting in a circular reasoning. So, again, in the words of the so-called "professionals" themselves: the DSM(-5) is a diagnostic tool, not a scientific theory.
So, the reasonings and conclusions of these so-called(: as they like to call themselves) "professionals" being built on quicksand: not being based in fact, but rather in self-fulfilled dogmatic prejudices - in which they and the likes and are instructed and taught and indeed required to believe in, in a fundamentalist and an irrevocable manner (EVEN if their written hearsay contradicts first-hand experience - all the while someone who has visited, say, the St. Peter's basilica in Rome will know it better, or more genuinely, than ten scholars/so-called "professionals" who have each read a thousand-page book on it but have never actually visited it, combined: perhaps the scholars/so-called "professionals" know more facts about it, but they do not know what it is like to be there inside the basilica and breathe in its atmosphere - and so the scholars/so-called "professionals" consequently know it less, and in that sense know less about it, in terms of actually knowing it and having witnessed/experienced it) they may quickly begin to see metaphorical mirages upon what they like to think of as 'examining' one. Especially as, like when under the influence of a substance like LSD, wording one's truth adequately under pressure - especially when answering questions unrelated/irrelevant to one's inner state(: and so experienced as 'random' by one's inner comprehensional system)- and unexpected questions from the pretend "professional" - may, towards these therefore ignorant, prejudiced or biased and therefore mistaken so-called "professionals", become increasingly challenging, they could - being fully prepared to appear credible to the public themselves by holding this pretence essentially being their paid profession, and this putting them in a position of power in addition to the potential power they could already hold over one as per decree of the law of the country, which position of power might influence their thinking and decision-making - fool themselves into thinking - or even pretend as by treating one as if - one has gone mad (whose incompetence in the way they treat you, and/or treatment they could/will or would then give you, might derail/damage one further, resulting in a self-fulfilling prophecy where the damage those so-called "professionals" incur to one is used, by these so-called "professionals", using one's country's legal system, as legal justification to intensify this treatment and so the potential damaging of one per incorrect treatment, which damage is then used as justification for the same wrongful treatment that is incurring that damage - this wrongful treatment originating from the being wrongly informed, and in that sense being incompetent, of said so-called "professionals), and then overpower one together(: with a group of so-called, by themselves, "mental health professionals" - thus stripping one of one's active legal rights in the process. So, they'll convince themselves one has gone mad, increasing one's level of fear - and again might attempt to, or might actually manage to, take your active rights and freedom away - also potentially/most likely increasing one's level of fear dramatically - and impairing one in one's ability to help oneself to an content/fulfilled/enjoyable position. The absence of this ability will then leave one victim to powers of fear and decay/degeneration - and really all the so-called "professionals" would know how to so is sedate you: they cannot peer inside your head, and wouldn't take your input serious if you told them, as by the procedure required from them: potential interpretations or explanations for the phenomena one might provide are, by default, not considered for their validity, but instead are listed as (diagnostic) symptom of a mental impairment/ailment, which conduct comes forth from the by them perceived negative connotation of such events, based on biased results as consequence of their biased input selection being the DSM(-5) only considering cases of psychological human suffering. And since the results would therefore end up as biased since they are based on a biased input selection, the so-called "professionals" would mistakenly deem potential psychic ability as psychic impairment - while in reality the fact there exists a need for the NTSB(: which investigates all civil aviation accidents) existing likewise does not necessarily mean one should not ever fly. Another mistake authorities may make, as happened to me (this is how I know), is they might manage to put one in an empty room 'without external triggers' - almost or quite like a punishment - which is completely unnatural to one's mind, following what surroundings/environment one is evolutionarily naturally 'programmed' for - leaving one to face these forces of evil without any support or distraction, so head on: which battle you're then more likely to lose (so I then asked for pens and drew a princess on the wall, from which then came a transparent - like when you see gas or hot air, but without the temperature difference - hallucinatory cloud, which I interpreted to be of good, positive energy); instead of putting one in a healthy, calm, happy and healthy environment with just a few calm, stable people - as would be most evolutionarily natural to one and therefore a suitable option for a fast recovery. Maintaining continuity and familiarity throughout one's trip would also be most vital, should things spin out of control/escalate psychically/mentally: staying in the same familiar surroundings, like your own home (or potentially a friend's home, or like where one began ones 'psychic journey', or LSD-trip, in the first place) will make it most likely that one does not lose their grip on reality - per familiarity. In almost all cases, after a good night's sleep, all damage will have disappeared: having been undone/gone.
So, either way, on LSD one interfaces with the (also: energetic/felt) surroundings and one's own mind through the reality or hallucinatory illusion, or sensitivity/alertness to subliminal meaning (which others may not notice without clarification, and when one's explanation is not based tangible cues may then perhaps have been a fabrication of one's mind), it shows one. One (when all goes according to plan without spiritual/energetic mishaps within one's psyche/inner) may also get guided insights - quite literally - sometimes of very advanced intricate nature: becoming hyper-intelligent in this sense; and very sensitive: both in terms of, say, music taste (one may barely recognize more trashy/hard tunes one knows upon hearing them as music - or the music seems faster than normal) as well as to subtle meaning in what one says or does - as well as intensified sensory sensitivity. When my friends came over after I had been sitting in my LSD-trip inside, alone by myself - I noticed that as we were conversating, sitting outside in the backyard, their voices began to sound like high-pitched voices (like as in the high-pitched voices from the 'Alvin and the Chipmunks' movies), as if they were moving at a different speed with their (including: inner) beings/mentally and energetically, than me; at least telling from the way they spoke.
On a side note: in life overall, one might make things as sleazy as one wants - but it is my contention that one should do this in a 'compartmentalized' way: practicing the 'what happens in the bedroom, stays in the bedroom - in case there are children around'-principle - meaning: one may have a super sleazy compartment where one is as shameless as one gets, moderately sleazy compartment: like making 'naughty' jokes, or while, say, going out to a club, or listening to, say, rough techno-music - then a yet less sleazy compartment where one is only slightly 'naughty'; and super non-sleazy compartment of pure innocent sincerity like from a sweet animal, without necessarily any [necessary, up-front] sleazy intent whatsoever; where these compartmentalizations are clearly separated based on the occasion (both within and for oneself and one's own pleasantness of experience - but also as in: where one makes the appropriate level of sleaziness accessible to the appropriate target audience) in order to safeguard true sincerity and intimacy optimally, and not feel slightly awkward in the absence of sleaziness, for example(: where that sincerity and intimacy could otherwise perhaps have blessed one, or the being able to bear the appreciation of increased levels of sincerity, such as in appreciating animals or nature, classical/old/intricate and refined art such as classical architecture, for example - or very sincere, spiritual music at the right occasion - all without the need to immediately desecrate the vulnerability in that sincerity under penalty of feeling awkward if you don't).

In interaction with others - especially when having smoked changa (an organic form of DMT) with my friend Rafael, which makes the interaction and everything else a bit or overwhelmingly more intense as one becomes rather sensitive and in that sense vulnerable - one will most likely also experience vivid visual hallucinations (not like where you see physical things that are not there, if that exists, but where you see cartoonish-like or including shapes and colors - as a broad example: I have seen both dollar signs moving through my vision during a less pleasant trip/session, and during a more pleasant trip/session have seen a white mandala-like flowery pattern being created quickly towards the center of my vision, in a sort of overlay over one's ordinary perspective on the physical in the layer of where the noise/grain in one's vision originate from - also such as the light which one sees when one closes ones eyes and when one then presses one's eyes [not too hard, softly] with one's hands). A trip lasts close to fifteen minutes at our level of intake, although during the trip I could not believe I would be feeling normal in just that time - although that ended up being the case. During another harsher trip with my friend, we were sitting outside at a hangout spot with a little pond, and I was a bit freaked out by the few people walking their dog across the pond seeing us smoke changa (not for legal reasons, as personal use was and is not being punished where I live: the Netherlands - just selling it on a noticable scale could land one in trouble if the police finds out) for some irrational reason, as I guess somewhere even I could have realised they really neither knew or cared. I addressed my friend, who was sitting silently across me on the ground cross-legged, having the time of his life, in a meditative, reassuringly calm state, saying something like: "people are seeing us!" As I looked at him, and he looked up, I could sense around him the meditative calmth in the space emanating from him and around him (one becomes more sensitive and vulnerable on the substance - that's the reason one might experience very chaotic energy is the feeling within/of one's body). He slowly and calmly, with a blinked towards me reassuringly, very kindly - I even saw like a white slightly flickering or super quickly pulsating cloud of light in my vision when looking at him as he looked up at me (when I got into intended contact with him, before our spaces went past each other: so, I was not picking up on his state of being before). The reason I'm telling you all this is because this proves that in interaction, people can pick up on one another's (inner/psychic/mental) state of being and feeling as well as intention, and be influenced by it: this inner/psychic/mental and feeling-wise state of being can be sensed in interaction of the energy of the other's awareness interacting with your state of being that you're experiencing and carry with you at that time (and perhaps vice versa). And it can, especially on substances, even induce such visual hallucinations, caused by the energy stimulating the perceptual sensors of one's visual awareness, causing a hallucination - where one is looking at something: one feels what one is seeing at/coming from the center of one's focal point - and so this state of being can be perceived within one's body as one feels the surroundings, being endowed with this hallucination - through this feeling one feels in the body one feels the influence from the surrounding, through the influence on one's mind influencing the visual and mind/cognition/thinking receptor(s)/receiver(s)/'through-putters' in the organ making up one's conscious awareness, resulting in a hallucination by what one's mind associated with the energy; which can therefore be illusory in a literal sense, but be an indication, and in that sense a reflection, of the (psychic) energy manifesting around one (also carrying consequences for the bodily feeling) through states of beings of perspectives taken by individuals through what one actually feels and symbolically or knowing that it is your sensors being influenced by the energy influencing one's mind, while the mind does in fact at least attempt to give a symbolic reference of the properties of the energy. One's state of being/felt (mental- and bodily) feeling is commonly very subjective from person to person, though the feeling can be mutual, and so people influence one another experiencing mutually felt feeling-energies.

The following - which is about a situation that has happened to me - would show how people's mental- and feeling-energies could influence one another when on Speed:
I was visiting my friend Jeroen. There also was another woman. We all were on Speed. I began to feel uneasy. In turn, the woman mainly, began to seem to comment on that. When Jeroen had left for about a total of five minutes, she said: "sometimes we do things under a certain pretence, where we pretend something to be the case - but really it is not the case" (in my native language Dutch: "soms doen we dingen onder voorbehoud, waar we allemaal doen alsof iets zo is, maar eigenlijk is het niet zo"). This statement made me think of another time with different friends where we all pretended to have a good time, but it took a while for us to actually get to the point we were in fact having a good time. She also said that around our stomach, we all have a [energetic] diaphragm and that when one 'loses' this, one would always be covered in 'shit' (this clearly seemed to be a metaphor for feeling-energies) - and she said that something had to happen with regard to this in our current situation. She also said something like: "do you hear that? 'He/it' [like a mental voice] keeps talking…". A bit later, she began to, quite noticably and later loudly, mumble (at energies) in herself while Jeroen and I were talking, increasingly loudly to the point she was just talking. Jeroen asked her what she was doing. All the while, I was under the impression that this had to do with me or my uneasy energy, although I didn't let it get to me as I knew I wasn't doing anything myself to cause this - both noticably or unnoticably. Yet a bit later, while Jeroen and I were talking, she began to yell to us: "you are talking about me, aren't you?! About my appearence or whatever?!" Jeroen quickly denied this as this was most definitely not the case, we were talking about a different matter entirely. At this point I left, but I could not help feeling like my own uneasiness, which also had been noticable to me - though I had pretended for this not to be the case, had influenced the woman energetically/feeling-wise; though I had not seen coming that its manifestation in her, leading to her interpretation, would be entirely different: I felt the woman had been commenting on the energy in the room, as if understanding that the negativity she felt must have been coming from me as I arrived last - mainly because she specifically addressed me in mentioning what she had said, and because these were not ordinary matters to talk about and she had not mentioned these matters when I had gotten to meet her at someone else's place - making it seem that there had to be this specific reason for mentioning this. She, though, felt we were commenting on her: responding to the same energy/ mutual feeling, yet creating a different concrete explanation/manifestation mentally.
Not too long after I had left, my friend Thom had come to visit Jeroen, and he said that he had a good time there (so during his visit, no one had freaked out [noticably] - or he almost certainly would have told me). Thom also told me the woman had still been there for a couple of hours during his visit.

We, as human-beings and as a species of animals, would have a psychic capacity and capability to let 'spirits'/psychic(: of the psyche) forces feelings/inner harmonics(: energies/frequencies) and ideas (originating from the interpretative intelligence construct that exists abstractly in our minds: concepts and their outer representation, being words/meanings) manifest/work through in the reality. It's the layer of tones through which spirits(: psychic/inner states [of being/thinking]) work. Animals (also) have heightened psychic and intuitive senses, and possess very sincere (inner and in the way they do things) harmonics/feeling-energy signatures. This could happen through one controlling one's body and manifesting one's mentality - or, for example, through inner harmonics/feelings and one's thinking/perpetuated ideas(: originating from the abstract interpretative intelligence construct conducted by our minds)/expectations manifesting in the outer. Those could - in more spiritual(/feeling-matic and psychic) sense - manifest more predominantly during psychic activation in the form of seeming coincidence and a feeling-connection between outer and inner aligning the outer with one's person or inner, or manifesting (according to) the expectations, ideas and spirits or feeling-, and psychic/mental, states one('s inner) invokes. Speculatively, this [alleged] seeming/apparent coincidence could exist through one's connection to and manifestation of a 'higher premise of intimacy'(: a 'premise of intimacy' being how intimate one deems the reality [that one would be in relation to] to be - like an/the implicit/subconscious 'contract' with existence that we all have, as would be implied by one's wielded ideas and energy signatures: one's inner harmonics - which also shape one's character/personality), which would be connected to the supernatural: the seeming integrated aspect to reality which can seem to integrally 'control' it, spanning the inner and outer aspects of reality to seemingly/apparently manifest these inner harmonics/energy signatures and/or cognitions/ideas one may wield - so ultimately, manifestations of forms of at least seeming omnipotence could be established through coincidence and/or a mental feeling-connection between inner and outer; the outer following one's intention and/or 'spirits': psychic/mental or feeling-states and ideas - or in other words: inner harmonics and cognitions/ideas/expectations one perpetuates/cognizes/experiences/resonates internally(: within), (also) manifesting externally(: without).

There is a collective psychic connection/atmosphere amongst living beings. This would be in the in higher frequencies, such as animals would be of a higher frequency of thinking - birds in turn could be of the high frequencies within their energy spectrum: they occupy the sky, which sky: lighter (atmo)spheres (of influence), is the more fleeting aspect of the planet/less dense, solid (and permanent), and further out from the center of mass. The thoughts/mindful verbally logical reasoning would be of a lower, more dense frequency: it is more object-matic (based in the more dense/solid everyday physical/outer forms); also, logical reasonings, especially as one picks those up from the outside world, also have the capacity to tend to cause one to ignore/overrule one's more spontaneous intuitive insights - which tend to be more connected to/integrated with the entirety of one's being, by coming forth from a hunches which are provided by one's natural inner or bodily(: outer-based) 'sensors'. So, one could also think of or pick up on reasonings and start following those. The higher frequencies would be less calculating/calculated in this respect, and be more spontaneous - where one reacts to feelings/sensing things or intuitive insight: so it functions more through feeling and therefore is more feeling-based.
When one becomes psychically activated, one is more prone to experiencing a more collective energetic connection throughout the bodies, interrelating them through mutually felt energies, being mutual feeling. Also, mentalities or ideas and psychic states of being may manifest throughout this connection, which could, in turn, influence the reality: energetically and through beings responding to this. One could, for example, through hallucinations, also begin to perceive anomalies in the field of feeling surrounding us that we conduct/respond to - also to where others respond to one interacting with these energies physically. For example, a certain feeling/character-atmosphere occupying a small space in front of one. The following happened to me while on Speed in the early afternoon after having skipped two nights of sleep. This idea that energy occupied the space had come about in my head in an instant (as one spontaneously comes up with things in one's mind) as I briefly (taking less than half of a second) saw a little hallucinatory grayish/slightly purplish dot in the area in front of your body when thinking about something. I then proceeded to, in a spontaneous/non-deliberate movement, occupy that space with my hand - which seemed to cause a physical response in my friend who had been falling asleep with his eyes closed for the past few minutes on the couch (to my right), waking him up at that particular time while no sound was made or a feeling of timing(: like when in a specific habit or rythm) seemed to have played a role. The flow of energy within, say, one's head - also as would come about from (the nature of) one's thinking - could - as another example - seem to influence a sort of energetic 'air'-pressure around it(: like by the forehead, for example - also influenced by the activity in one's head and one's gaze that emanates from around there/one's eyes), to where its configuration may become noticable by it causing one to feel an itch(ing sensation). These would be like tiny fluctuation/alterations in this (energetic pressure-)'force-field' we can feel also as deeper/heavier pressures or lighter feelings around us, connected to the energetic psychic grid, which psychic forces and psyches influence it. When psychically activated, this influence may become more explicitly apparent. These energies and/or hallucinations can also respond to one's breathing: such as having an obstructed breath(: feeling an obstructed feeling when breathing) or not; also such as would be configured through smoking or vaping, for example(: like to, as it were - in terms of one's feeling - go beyond the obstructed feeling through one's breathing) - (also) configuring one's feeling and (so) the energy around one. (Psychic) energies(: states of being) may also induce hallucinatory smells. This effect tends to be particularly noticable on ketamine, but may also be occur on other substances - such as when on Speed or LSD.
Hallucinations would be contact with the psychic/energetic realm. In the psychic/energetic realm can be spiritual energies (like feelings/inner harmonics or thought/mental states of being, or like feeling one could feel with the feeling/sensitivity of one's body, also potentially manifesting visual hallucinations - or multiple or all could go hand-in-hand) interacting with one's body and psyche (such as on ketamine, and LSD and other psychedelics) - akin to as if one was receiving a sort of messages or energetic feedback/throughput, or as if one was receiving something like (loving) maintanance, as a sort of energetic gift, to one's energy(/'ethereal light'/'plasma')-body.

One could (for oneself) point to something within one's mind (such as a memory or something one envisions), mentally (- one could then also say/proclaim what one intends/means to go with verbally or non-verbally). This shows that we have a thought-body, within its own thought-dimension/fabric(: the inner) - which can interact with the outer energetically. As such, we not only have a physical body, but we also have a thought-body or existence in the inner or thought-dimension. This thought-dimension is based in resonance(/'sound'/feeling)-based creating-intelligence. Since actual existence occurs within (and not without - so spans) one's inner experience as one's senses reflect the outer into the fabrics of the inner perception(s) or the thought-dimension - where one as an individual resides experiencing the throughput from one's own thinking, feelings and outer - this outer or any dimension(s) would be something which the inner tune's in to or turns into, and so this outer would grow out of the collective thought-dimension of which we primarily and originally are thought-beings, which is what the 'sound'-based/wave-technical nature of the outer would show or at least indicate, as - contrary to the object-matic world of solid objects that emerges from it - at the root of this physical world it shares this quality of being frequency/tone-based and so (metaphorical) 'sound'-oriented or of wave-technical nature(: particle-wave duality, for example - and electrons orbiting the nucleus of an atom form/display cymatic-like shapes). In this thought-dimension, meaning (which requires an observer: an individual to experience it) is primary as opposed to being something like secundary, such as in the outer that therefore would emerge from this primary collective thought-dimension: being but a mere means to an end(: something we, as psyche's/spirits, utilize to experience and embody meaning). These thoughts and feelings could originate from the outer circumstances: the more bodily/lower sensations - which sensations often present themselves more pressingly, hence are associated with the lower, denser frequencies, like: a nasty/stressful feeling that won't go away after something happened or is set to happen - and (often) logical reasonings: logical reasonings one picks up on in the outer could get one diverted from one's inner intuition - which is more integrated with the entirety of one's being, though it may not always seem logical. One could receive feelings and thoughts that arise as reflections from outer circumstances, or those that originate from one's own inner intuition and inner being: from one's being as it originally came about in the thought-dimension, or other beings or (psychic) forces within it. So thoughts/feelings could originate from one's brain and body primarily, but the brain and body also is a conductor/receiver of one's thought-body and its thought-dimension: the mind - from which the thought and/or feeling might primarily originate, from deep within one's (inner) being (such as from deep within one's feelings/intuitions). Something that would explain this 'thought-dimension' would be that we, as spirits or beings within/from the inner/psychic, would originate from a cosmic intelligence whose 'mind'(: its 'inner' psyche) is this collective thought-dimension from which our psyches/spirits would spring/would have arisen - that could seek embodiment(s)(: such as a life in the outer reality, for example) in order to experience certain forms of meaning(: live through and give substance to [potential] 'storylines') (like how one would have been when facing adversity, for example) or experience [the universe's] modes of being(: such as being a growing plant, or form of an animal - such as a tiger or human being, for example), and so from which also the outer would spring; from which, once again, seems to spring the intelligence/life it ends up conducting(/receiving, such as through one's brain and the body responding to/conducting one's intention to do something) when manifesting the different iterations of this 'intelligence's' - or rather this 'life-force's' (from which therefore this 'ethereal light would spring/originate and be of, pertruding throughout the layers of reality and morphing into the realities as formed by different frequencies with different densities) - in this case, outer manifestations/lifeform, so which is inherently intelligent(ly designed) and bears(/conducts) this intelligence(: conscious awareness): and so, perhaps, on an energetic level, this life-force/intelligence-dimension or psychic/inner realm/'mind'(-structure) our awareness would be part of and, as spirits/souls, originate from. That we are born sublimely innocent would indicate that as spirits, we originate from a place of unblemished intimacy and so sublime alignment - which would interact with the solid forms where there would be enough energy for things to begin to start to flow/move, through which this higher realm could work through its energetic resonance. It would be constituted in the energy present throughout the universe, our universe being a manifestation (within/)of it(s field) (through which it could work).

During psychic activation, one may begin 'talking to' a (more) fundamental 'root-level' of the reality - as if talking to a 'unified backend' (to the 'front end' being the actually - as we speak - existing: the fabrics, or 'curtain' upon/through which things happen, such as the physically present and experiential fabric within one's inner dimension): like the trunk or root to the tree rather than the branch, that would have acces to the/a 'root-level' of the reality - which would be integrated with one's (including: inner) being and the psyche, and with the outer reality on a more fundamental level; and thus could influence them in seemingly semi-omnipotent/'supernatural' ways - which it would achieve through through energetics/resonances and 'sound': as in the 'sounding' of tones/frequencies. Note that both our inner and outer are frequency/energy/'sound' or 'tone'-based, and so like the inner (and also fundamentally the outer) this 'unified backend' will be an energetic(: of alternating densities - of tension and alleviation) manifestation. So, one would then be talking to underlying hidden energetics: an energetic layer underlying/throughout the reality connected to the psyche, manifesting psychic forces (more and/or less well-meaning ones) through energetics - which also could manifest hallucinations, and could - along with the hallucination or by themselves - manifest intuitions/ideas/thinking. This 'unified backend', or psychic forces connected to it, could also manifest coincidences: where things/events could/would be foreseen ahead of time - both energetically or through a subconscious non-local awareness/'dimension' (to things) that somehow takes place; where events cause a reaction to them - like in one's feeling, thinking or behavior - prior to them taking place. This can make one sense there could/would be a supreme (semi-)omnipotent intelligence at play. Nature is [like] a supercomputer; whether that supposed intelligence would be that one's own subconscious intelligence (beyond one's own consciously calculated intent, which one may acces in spontaneity or through intuition) or (one's own or an) inner/psychic being, a (supposed) 'God'/'the universe'/'infinity': the 'all-seeing eye', manifesting a (collective) intelligence we would be of - perhaps functioning jointly with and through our own subconscious and conscious intelligence (this would also be referred to as 'channeling', and the psychic forces could be of/on behalf of this intelligence or vice versa - which would commonly be referred to as 'spirit-guides') that one interfaces with and wields through being in alignment/tune with it/them. This force could direct/influence/determine or orchestrate outcomes within the reality, as if having access to the/a 'root-level' of the reality; as if there is a reality behind the reality, being not only the 'dimension'/reality of (the fabric of) our inner perception(: that of actual existence, something that is actually there [in one's experience/perception] at that moment) and the space it occurs in, being one's psyche (through which's fabric forces, including psychic forces, may manifest: connected to the energetic/'sound'-realm, which would also bear the spiritual- and soul-realm) - but also a reality behind the reality as in towards 'the source' of our current existence that people often refer to as (towards) the 'Gods' or 'God', that we would intrinsically be of/stem from: towards the so-called 'higher self' or towards what would commonly be referred to as heaven, which would be a realm of harmonious(ly resonating) well-balancedness (also: resulting in a state towards equilibrium, being the 'light' [no pressing weights/tensions]) and/or symmetry(: discrepancies/tensions cancelling out into alleviation/the more fleeting), and thus of alignment: like a 'unified backend' to our reality, connected to the outer 'dimension'/fabric of the physical as well as the inner(: the inner/psychic layer - through which forces, including psychic forces: these psychic- or intelligence-forces of/within this energetic 'unified back-end', may manifest - which at least seem to be able to 'interpret'/'weigh'/understand the meaning something would have to someone), which would span towards the source as well. This 'unified backend'/'root-level' becoming apparent would be because everything: things and us, are (of) an integrally working-together intelligence - or intelligent (in the sense of being of sublimely intelligent 'design' as arose from, and is intrinsic to, the fundaments of our reality) dynamic (which would be of intelligence in the sense of being non-destructive or consctructive, resulting in it forming something meaningfully coherent and in that sense aligned), that is resonance/harmonic/'sound'/frequency-based: we - including our emotional and character-energy signatures/inner harmonics - currently are physical manifestations of frequencies/harmonics/'sounds': specific frequencies/harmonics/'tones' forming archetypes of characteristics. Coincidences that could occur often include things happening at a meaningful time: coincidence really comes down to timing, or psychic energetics/a mutual feeling. Coincidence could be when outer manifestations become as though aligned with one('s inner aspect) - either through timing: being at the right place at the right time doing the right thing, so to say - or through psychic energetics/mutual feeling (through this mutually felt feeling sensitive beings like animals could also respond to your thinking, for example: showing themselves or making a noise), in which case there really is more at play than pure coincidence as there is a causal connection, being the subconsciously responding to the energy/feeling among them; or, in the case of a mutual/coincidental feeling of timing, both could also subconsciously be responding to the same 'rythm' in the sense of the pacing of time, or conditions: like an obvious order to do things in. The psychic energetics would be collective (hence: potentially 'mutual' feeling), for example: one could pick up on one's inner cognitions when very sensitive to and/or knowing this person (also from visible cues) or, say, pick up on one's general emotional state or intention intuitively - or one could feel and be influenced by the general mood in the room as you would create together while in company: a mutual feeling in any case. These coincidences can seem to defy ordinary linear causality - as if something had exerted influence to orchestrate it and/or had pre-aligned factors/beings and/or could foresee something happening that you could otherwise not have known. Having a way of being able to foresee things one could otherwise not have foreseen, and somehow influencing things/beings - including energetically - to orchestrate their meaningful timing/alignment: making one subconsciously react to something before it happens or before one knows about it - is what I mean by being connected to a 'root-level' of reality: as if one is dealing with psychic/energetic/non-physical forces that have access to 'admin-privilleges' in the reality, being able to access information we would (otherwise) not be able to ourselves (at least with one's mindful/attentive/conscious thinking), and being able to manipulate that after which the reality forms.

 • One time, I was on speed, the idea had come to me that everything is a computer. That night, I was under heavy anxiety. I had somehow come to the idea that I was living in a computer, and that everyone around me had always been a sort of videogame-character. Because of the anxiety, I felt like I couldn't stay home. When I went outside, it felt like everyone was making psychopathic remarks towards me. so I decided to try, as a sort of repercussion, what would happen if I saw everyone as a video game character, an 'NPC' ('non-playable character": a videogame-character that serves as a figurant and is operated by the computer), and started called them that in my head (in my internal monologue) if I felt I was being 'verbally' attacked. (At a different time, I had come to the conclusion that at least not all people were a computer as I saw the genuinely friendly smile on the face of the person who sold me Speed at the time - he has a friendly smile apparently - and decided there had to be intimacy in that). As I started calling people NPC in my head the anxiety rapidly vanished. At the end of the evening (around 23:30), while I was already walking home, a young guy with dark skin in around his early twenties(?) approached me, who, in a very calming tone of voice, asked me: "do you have cigarette?" (in my native language Dutch: "heb jij sigaret?"). The feeling of intimacy I sensed in his voice kind of brought me back to normality in the sense where I sensed that such intimacy would not come from a computer. About one and a half or a couple of weeks later, it had again come to the point where I was decidedly considering if everything was secretly a computer. When I went outside and walked in the direction of the local supermarket, I ran into the exact same guy asking the exact same question: "do you have cigarette?" (in my native language: "heb jij sigaret?"). I never saw him again after that. I live in a town of about 152.000 people at the time (around spring 2020). An incredible coincidence.

The hallucinatory forms correspond to the more subtle/lighter frequencies of the energetic spectrum (as opposed to the solid physical forms), and (could) become increasingly visible as one becomes more sensitive to those/'raises one's frequency' as the activity of the energy of one's conscious awareness/attention becomes more centered around that of one's mind (as opposed to one's bodily energies): the center of one's attention becoming more oriented around one's head (- as one opens one's so-called 'third eye'). Hallucinations are when the configurations of the psychic/inner perceptual organ, and so how that influences the fabric/medium of what one perceives (or perceives through), become influenced by the configuration of the body's energetics and energies felt through the body's energetics - so hallucinations are correlated with one's aura. This becomes apparent when one sees something move that is not moving; when hallucinating that something - which could also be a ceiling or doorpost - that is standing still in in place appears to move: revealing that the psychic fabric that underlies our experience of what we experience through it. The fabric on which things live moves, also changing one's aura/bodily energetics and the configuration of the psychic/inner perceptual organ. Hallucinations are essentially the (mental) fabric of your inner perception beginning to act on its own, instead of just being a means of experiencing the physical. This is a mental fabric: it comes about from one's cognition (and can bring about cognition).

 • The following doesn't actually involve anything regarding physical (or 'commonly observed') matter, but I still wanted to share it because it might show how the auric field and one's 'inner space' or 'inner-verse'(: the space within which 'you' are, looking at the screen which comprises your vision, hearing whatever you hear, including thoughts and such, and are feeling your body, etc.) are interrelated. I was at home, on Speed. I had begun seeing these black blobs and stains, and had gotten some anxiety. My friend (François) came over, who warned me of voices in the head. By the time he left, the black blobs were completely gone, and the anxiety had vanished. But then came the thought: "what if the anxious thoughts come back?" The moment I had that thought, I saw a small black smudge/spot appear in the distance. In the blink of an eye, I saw it quickly move (in a kind of 'jumping' motion) to the left of my head in the corner of my eye, entering my left ear. It then appeared in the inner space of my mind/vision from the left, moved to the center in front of the 'screen' of my inner vision in a second - and from there 'jumped' into the center of my vision; which I then saw behave as if being a screen because I saw the same kind of ripples come off of it you see when you throw a rock into the water (as seen from the top), which wavy rings lasted about a second and were very crisp and clear. The moment that had happened, I began to hear a continuous indiscriminate fake English chatter in my head (from a thought-voice). I decided I needed to go to sleep as soon as possible. Distracting myself while I was going to sleep, I could somehow 'move' the 'location' or 'center' from which the chatter was coming in my mind, to outside the bounds of my mind so I wouldn't hear it anymore - feeling that if I would be anxious and think about it, it would most likely be right there again. I stayed very calm and went to sleep, and luckily, the next morning, everything was fine. This true story reveals that energy in/around (or felt by) the body is or can be connected to hallucinations, that hallucinations can be connected to the mind, and that this energy has a psychic dimension that is connected to/can influence the mind.

 • One time, on Speed, when I deliberately 'breathed into'(: deliberately 'pointing' with your mind and aiming your breath there mentally, imagining this is makes it so the 'breath' and its psychic charge/impact associated with the breath will then literally land there at the place in the video at the time of recording as if literally aiming then and there, following the principle of: what you see before you actually - through the psychic fabric - is connected to before you, or could be accessed non-locally) a YouTube-video; at the exact spot in the background of the room that could be seen on the video where I had 'aimed' my '(mental) breath', simultanously with my actual breathing out, a coathanger that was hanging there on a rack in the background (as one of more) suddenly got gittered 'out of nowhere', as if having been touched or hit by someone - to where the maker of the YouTube-video had actually added in a cartoonish picture of indication of movement(: like a few short lines would be) along with a short word like: 'boink!', showing she wanted to signify the fact that it moved so seemingly on its own unexpectedly. To give a bit of context: I had been doing this 'breathing into' the video for a while that day: like a half hour to an hour, and had begun to see all kinds of connections which I liked to make myself believe were true: such as when I breathed into the video, the shade of the video suddenly became more blueish - which color would then correspond to a higher chakra in my mind - and so that change in shade would have happened also as a response to having blown a 'higher' 'chakra-resonance' into the video - and more of such ideas and associations I could devise and think into 'being true'. But it does not explain how the coathanger hanging in the exact spot I was consciously targeting with my mind, that was not being touched directly and didn't visibly seem to be touched indirectly, gittered unexpectedly exactly when I breathed out 'into the video' (as was my intention - to see if I could influence anything in the video) - as if this occurrence were an interdimensional anomaly or multi-dimensional interaction. This is an example of how these psychic phenomena first start out with one imagining a lot of patterns, as it were as a side effect of trying to open the door to these 'higher-dimensional' occurrences actually occurring that normally aren't possible, thanks to the substance of choice I had consumed that day and at that time.

 • There were a few birds in my backyard. They were singing. I was sitting in my room, facing the backyard. After a while, I started thinking about stuff. Meanwhile, the birds quieted down a bit. Realizing the birds were still there, I said to myself: "let me just sit with the birds", and when I did the birds started chirping again.

 • Another time, I was with someone (I forgot his name), and we were waiting for two other friends(: one friend whom we'll call x, and Lianne) we had agreed to meet up with. I was having some draining thoughts and anxiety after smoking a joint with this someone I was with. We were all in a psychosis clinic at the time (where I've had the worst time of my life). When we saw Lianne walking towards us, for some reason I associated her beige clothes with like a uniform you might get in a concentration camp, which is what I envisioned the psychosis clinic to be. I didn't want to think anything bad about a friend, but out of frustration about the situation, I gave in to the thought that her clothes kind of looked like a (metaphorical) concentration camp-uniform - agreeing with and thinking that. That second, the friend I had smoked the joint with turned to me and said: "why do you say negative things about her? She is your friend", while neither of had been saying anything. So he was able to pick up on the energy that was going through my mind. Also, those types of ways where one is gaslit by treacherous thought patterns can occur during - and can be quite typical of - psychic activation, as may occur after smoking weed or consuming other certain substances (such as Speed).

On LSD, overall, one begins to feel the spirit behind the silence, 'hear'/sense the insights that the silence has to 'say'/'speak' (one somehow gets insights intuitively, yet might not be able to locate how one would know - sometimes coming up with things, like an obscure word perhaps, that one didn't know one knew; note that the quieter 'voices' are most likely the more healthy ones) or the hallucination you'd be looking at has to 'say' through the presence it holds. One migt also be able to - attuning to, say, nature, through one's thinking/mental reasoning - direct how/through which 'hallucinatory lens' one perceives the reality; such as: does your backyard suddenly feel like it's in the middle of a forest? Really one could speak of: what spirit one is connecting to. One might then find that at the moment the hallucination or perception has just shifted, suddenly a bird - for example - may reveal itself as if being able to feel your getting attuned with the connected sensitive grid where beings are able to sense one another 'think' or 'feel' or have are able to pick up on levels of states of being; where things could also, at least appear, to get an intensified personal(/spiritually meaningful) connotation or where vibes, or disturbances such as someone's sounds - say, from behind a wall or from (elsewhere in) the building one might be in - could seem more deliberate or personal.

 • I was at home, on LSD, weed, and Speed. I heard a police car driving by with the siren on in the distance (most likely on the ring road nearby my house). Since the siren-sound 'pertruded' into my space, I couldn't help but feel like I had to define my attitude in relation to it in some way. I contemplated how, because they were driving there, I could be in my own home safely. As I had considered that, I softly said the word: "bless" - and then (a second later at the most), the police car turned off its siren.